Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628457›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2016

Metal coverage ratio of pipeline embolization device for treatment of unruptured aneurysms: Reality check.

Liang-Der Jou, Gouthami Chintalapani, Michel E Mawad

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Traumatic vertebral artery transection injury: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Optimizing contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT protocol to facilitate simultaneous visualization of neurovascular pathologies and surrounding structures of interest.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Toward Better Understanding of Flow Diversion in Bifurcation Aneurysms.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018
    Article
  16. In vitro digital subtraction angiographic evaluation of flow diverters in a patient-specific aneurysm.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liang-Der JouDepartment of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA ljou@houstonmethodist.org.
Gouthami ChintalapaniSiemens Medical Solutions Hoffman Estates, Illinois, USA.
Michel E MawadDepartment of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe metal coverage ratio (MCR) of a flow diverter influences the intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics; a high MCR will occlude an aneurysm early, while a low MCR may delay aneurysm occlusion. The true MCR of a pipeline embolization device (PED) could be lower due to oversize, device deformation, or aneurysm location. In this study deviation of the true MCR from the nominal MCR is assessed and whether their difference affects aneurysm occlusion rate is determined.

methodsA total of 40 consecutive patients, each of them treated by one PED for their aneurysms at the internal carotid artery (ICA), were retrospectively analyzed. The DynaCT images of these deployed PEDs were used to determine their true dimensions and estimate three MCRs (local, mean, and nominal). These data were compared in two groups of patients who had different aneurysm outcomes at six months.

resultsThe difference in the local MCR between two groups is small, but statistically significant (24.5% vs 21.6%, p=05). The local MCR is consistently lower than the nominal MCRs (23.2% vs 30.2%, p<0.001); however, the difference between the mean and local MCRs is small (23.9% vs 23.2%).

conclusionsAn expectation that a PED can achieve a MCR of 30% may not be reasonable. Device oversize and deformation during deployment lower the local MCR by 5-7%. A lowered MCR affects the aneurysm occlusion rate at six months.

Indexed as

MetalsStentsAneurysm, RupturedCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignTreatment OutcomeMetalsAneurysmsflow divertersubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID26628457
PMCPMC4757378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.