ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2015
Psychologists' Contributions to Patient-Centered Medical Homes.
Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Perinatal Mental Health Risk within a Fetal Care Center.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2021Review
- Referral to Digital Parent Training in Primary Care: Facilitators and Barriers.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2020Article
- Quality Improvement in Health Care: The Role of Psychologists and Psychology.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2018Review
- The role of the psychologist in the veterans administration's patient aligned care team and huddle: A review, practical recommendations, and a call to action.Health psychology research · 2018Article
- Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: Advantages and Challenges.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017Review
- Identification and Management of Eating Disorders in Integrated Primary Care: Recommendations for Psychologists in Integrated Care Settings.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2017Review
- Managing Difficult Patients: Roles of Psychologists in the Age of Interdisciplinary Care.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mounting evidence supports the value of integrated healthcare and the need for interprofessional practice within patient-centered medical homes (PCMH). Incorporating behavioral health services is key to fully implementing the PCMH concept. Unfortunately, psychologists have not been front and center in this integrative and interprofessional care movement nor have they typically received adequate training or experience to work effectively in these integrated care programs. This article builds the case for the value of PCMHs, particularly those that incorporate behavioral health services. Attention is paid to the diverse roles psychologists play in these settings, including as direct service providers, consultants, teachers/supervisors, scholars/program evaluators, and leaders. There is a discussion of the competencies psychologists must possess to play these roles effectively. Future directions are discussed, with a focus on ways psychologists can bolster the PCMH model by engaging in interprofessional partnerships related to education and training, practice, research, and leadership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26628412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.