Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26628056›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2015

Bloodstream infections in patients with malignancies: implications for antibiotic treatment in a Ghanaian tertiary setting.

Noah Obeng-Nkrumah, Appiah-Korang Labi, Michael Ebo Acquah, Eric S Donkor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A One-Health Perspective onEnvironmental health insights · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noah Obeng-NkrumahDepartment of Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P.O. Box 4326, Accra, Ghana, West Africa. successfulnoahforchrist@yahoo.com.
Appiah-Korang LabiDepartment of Microbiology, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 77, Accra, Ghana, West Africa. appiahl@yahoo.com.
Michael Ebo AcquahDepartment of Haematology, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 77, Accra, Ghana, West Africa. bondze@gmail.com.
Eric S DonkorDepartment of Microbiology, School of Biomedical and Allied Health Sciences, University of Ghana, P.O. Box 4326, Accra, Ghana, West Africa. ericsdon@hotmail.com.
Korle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBloodstream infections (BSI) remain a major cause of mortality in patients with malignancies. We present the first report on the microbiological profile of bacteraemia and fungaemia among cancer patients in Ghana.

methodsFrom January 2010 through December 2013, we retrospectively analyzed the spectrum of bloodstream pathogens in cancer patients from Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Ghana--focusing on multidrug resistant isolates (MDRs).

resultsOverall BSI were confirmed in 22% (n = 93/453) of total blood cultures. Our data highlights a co-dominance of Gram-negative (n = 49/93, 52.6%) and Gram-positive (n = 40/93, 43.0%) bacteria with the former less likely to infect children than adults [odds ratio (OR), 0.56; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.91; p value = 0.027]. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most isolated bacteria (30.1%; n = 28/93). About 61% (n = 25/41) of Enterobacteriaceae isolates were resistant to cefotaxime; a majority (n = 24/25, 96%) of which were MDRs and mostly susceptible to amikacin and levofloxacin. Four (80 %) penicillin resistant streptococci were found; 2 of which were MDRs and sensitive to erythromycin and cefuroxime. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin resistant enterococci were not identified. In multivariate analysis, the Enterobacteriaceae compared to other organisms were significantly associated with multidrug resistance (adjusted OR, 33.6; 95% CI 6.41-88.73; p value 0.001).

conclusionMDRs, especially cefotaxime resistant Enterobacteriaceae, are common among patients with cancer in our institution but vary among different patient populations. The results show that empiric antibiotic treatment for cancer patients cannot be done effectively without regard for selective antimicrobial use based on local epidemiologic data.

Indexed as

BacteremiaComorbidityDrug Resistance, MultipleFungemiaGhanaHospitals, TeachingHumansNeoplasmsTertiary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID26628056
PMCPMC4667459
OpenAlexW2182080230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.