Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26627949›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2015

Multiscale Gaussian network model (mGNM) and multiscale anisotropic network model (mANM).

Kelin Xia, Kristopher Opron, Guo-Wei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning predictions from unpredictable chaos.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  3. Persistent Sheaf Laplacian Analysis of Protein Flexibility.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiscale Laplacian Learning.Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. HERMES: PERSISTENT SPECTRAL GRAPH SOFTWARE.Foundations of data science (Springfield, Mo.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Persistent spectral graph.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2020
    Article
  9. A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelin XiaDepartment of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Kristopher OpronDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.
Guo-Wei WeiMathematical Biosciences Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.

Funding

Collaborative research: Geometric flow approach to implicit solvation modelingR01GM090208 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WEI, GUOWEI · 2009 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090208NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM-090208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian network model (GNM) and anisotropic network model (ANM) are some of the most popular methods for the study of protein flexibility and related functions. In this work, we propose generalized GNM (gGNM) and ANM methods and show that the GNM Kirchhoff matrix can be built from the ideal low-pass filter, which is a special case of a wide class of correlation functions underpinning the linear scaling flexibility-rigidity index (FRI) method. Based on the mathematical structure of correlation functions, we propose a unified framework to construct generalized Kirchhoff matrices whose matrix inverse leads to gGNMs, whereas, the direct inverse of its diagonal elements gives rise to FRI method. With this connection, we further introduce two multiscale elastic network models, namely, multiscale GNM (mGNM) and multiscale ANM (mANM), which are able to incorporate different scales into the generalized Kirchhoff matrices or generalized Hessian matrices. We validate our new multiscale methods with extensive numerical experiments. We illustrate that gGNMs outperform the original GNM method in the B-factor prediction of a set of 364 proteins. We demonstrate that for a given correlation function, FRI and gGNM methods provide essentially identical B-factor predictions when the scale value in the correlation function is sufficiently large. More importantly, we reveal intrinsic multiscale behavior in protein structures. The proposed mGNM and mANM are able to capture this multiscale behavior and thus give rise to a significant improvement of more than 11% in B-factor predictions over the original GNM and ANM methods. We further demonstrate the benefits of our mGNM through the B-factor predictions of many proteins that fail the original GNM method. We show that the proposed mGNM can also be used to analyze protein domain separations. Finally, we showcase the ability of our mANM for the analysis of protein collective motions.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationAnisotropyElasticityNormal DistributionProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26627949
PMCPMC4670452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.