ArticleInternational ophthalmology2016
Evaluation of the retinal ganglion cell and choroidal thickness in young Turkish adults with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of retina, choroid, and microvascular structures in amblyopic patients using OCT and OCTA.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- 3D choroidal vascularity index in hyperopic amblyopic eyes of preschool children: a case-control study using SS-OCTA.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- OCT Assessment of Deep Optic Nerve Head, Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness, and Retinal Layers in Unilateral Anisometropic Amblyopia.Beyoglu eye journal · 2026Article
- Assessment of macular choroidal and retinal thickness: a cohort study in Tibetan healthy children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Choroidal Vascular Structure in Hyperopic Anisometropic Amblyopia.Beyoglu eye journal · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Choroidal Vascular Index in Amblyopic Patients.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- How does anisometropia affect the choroidal vascularity index?Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Article
- Macular retinal and choroidal thickness in unilateral amblyopia using swept-source optical coherence tomography.BMC ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Evaluation of the retinal ganglion cell and choroidal thickness in young Turkish adults with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.International ophthalmology · 2017Article
- A Meta-Analysis of Choroidal Thickness Changes in Unilateral Amblyopia.Journal of ophthalmology · 2017Review
- Choroidal Structure in Children with Anisohypermetropic Amblyopia Determined by Binarization of Optical Coherence Tomographic Images.PloS one · 2016Article
- CAN Optical Coherence Tomography redefine amblyopia?Romanian journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the choroidal thickness (CT) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness of the normal fellow eyes and the amblyopic eyes using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) in young Turkish adults with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Patients with unilateral hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia were enrolled and underwent a full ophthalmological assessment, including best-corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction, and axial length (AL) measurements. Cirrus EDI-OCT was used to obtain subfoveal CT, GCC thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and central macular thickness (CMT) measurements. Comparison was performed between the amblyopic eyes and the normal fellow eyes. Forty-three hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic patients were enrolled in this study. Mean age of 23 female and 20 male patients was 24.8 ± 7.4 years. Mean AL was 21.9 ± 1.3 and 22.4 ± 0.9 mm in amblyopic and fellow eyes, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean subfoveal CT measurements were 325.4 ± 44.2 and 317.9 ± 42.7 µ in amblyopic and fellow eyes, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Mean GCC thickness was 83.8 ± 3.6 µ in amblyopic eyes and 83.5 ± 3.9 µ in the fellow eyes. Statistically significant difference was not seen between the groups (P > 0.05). Mean RNFL and mean CMT measurements were also similar in two groups (P > 0.05). Subfoveal CT, CMT, RNFL, and GCC thickness measurements were not statistically significant between hyperopic anisometropic amblyopic eyes and normal fellow eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.