ReviewCancer research2015
Essential Components of Cancer Education.
Review in Cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building the cancer research workforce through implementation of theDiscover education · 2026Article
- A human-centered, participatory design approach to cancer research training.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From Imaging to Impact: A Multi-Disciplinary T32 Program Framework and Initial Insights for Training in Image-Guided Cancer Therapy [Advance Publication].Advances in cancer education and quality improvement · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities in training cancer researchers.Nature cancer · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study of Participant Perceptions of a Cancer Research Education Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- The cancer epidemic in the Caribbean region: Further opportunities to reverse the disease trend.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Review
- Tisch Cancer Institute Scholars Program: Mentored Cancer Research Training Pipeline for Medical Students.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- "UHAND"-A National Cancer Institute Funded Partnership to Advance Cancer Health Equity through Scholar Training.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Promoting Scientist-Advocate Collaborations in Cancer Research: Why and How.Cancer research · 2018Review
- Methods of Academic Course Planning for Cancer Biology PhD Students to Enhance Knowledge of Clinical Oncology.Cancer research · 2017Article
- Comparison of views on the need for continuing education on oral cancer between general dentists and oral medicine experts: A Delphi survey.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern cancer therapy/care involves the integration of basic, clinical, and population-based research professionals using state-of-the-art science to achieve the best possible patient outcomes. A well-integrated team of basic, clinical, and population science professionals and educators working with a fully engaged group of creative junior investigators and trainees provides a structure to achieve these common goals. To this end, the structure provided by cancer-focused educational programs can create the integrated culture of academic medicine needed to reduce the burden of cancer on society. This summary outlines fundamental principles and potential best practice strategies for the development of integrated educational programs directed at achieving a work force of professionals that broadly appreciate the principals of academic medicine spanning the breadth of knowledge necessary to advance the goal of improving the current practice of cancer care medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.