Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626911›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2016

Nutrient Limitation in Surface Waters of the Oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean Sea: an Enrichment Microcosm Experiment.

A Tsiola, P Pitta, S Fodelianakis, R Pete, I Magiopoulos, P Mara, S Psarra, T Tanaka, B Mostajir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

A TsiolaInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Ex American Base Gournes, P.O. Box 2214, 71003, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. atsiola@hcmr.gr.
P PittaInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Ex American Base Gournes, P.O. Box 2214, 71003, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
S FodelianakisBiology Department, Marine Ecology Laboratory, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
R PeteLaboratoire d'Ecologie des Systèmes Marins Côtiers (ECOSYM), CNRS-Université Montpellier 2 & 1-Ifremer-IRD, Montpellier, France.
I MagiopoulosInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Ex American Base Gournes, P.O. Box 2214, 71003, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
P MaraChemistry Department, Environmental Chemical Processes Laboratory, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
S PsarraInstitute of Oceanography, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Ex American Base Gournes, P.O. Box 2214, 71003, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
T TanakaINSU-CNRS, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, Villefranche sur Mer cedex, France.
B MostajirLaboratoire d'Ecologie des Systèmes Marins Côtiers (ECOSYM), CNRS-Université Montpellier 2 & 1-Ifremer-IRD, Montpellier, France.
Hellenic Centre for Marine Research · GRUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Crete · GRKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SASorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth rates of planktonic microbes in the pelagic zone of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea are nutrient limited, but the type of limitation is still uncertain. During this study, we investigated the occurrence of N and P limitation among different groups of the prokaryotic and eukaryotic (pico-, nano-, and micro-) plankton using a microcosm experiment during stratified water column conditions in the Cretan Sea (Eastern Mediterranean). Microcosms were enriched with N and P (either solely or simultaneously), and the PO4 turnover time, prokaryotic heterotrophic activity, primary production, and the abundance of the different microbial components were measured. Flow cytometric and molecular fingerprint analyses showed that different heterotrophic prokaryotic groups were limited by different nutrients; total heterotrophic prokaryotic growth was limited by P, but only when both N and P were added, changes in community structure and cell size were detected. Phytoplankton were N and P co-limited, with autotrophic pico-eukaryotes being the exception as they increased even when only P was added after a 2-day time lag. The populations of Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus were highly competitive with each other; Prochlorococcus abundance increased during the first 2 days of P addition but kept increasing only when both N and P were added, whereas Synechococcus exhibited higher pigment content and increased in abundance 3 days after simultaneous N and P additions. Dinoflagellates also showed opportunistic behavior at simultaneous N and P additions, in contrast to diatoms and coccolithophores, which diminished in all incubations. High DNA content viruses, selective grazing, and the exhaustion of N sources probably controlled the populations of diatoms and coccolithophores.

Indexed as

Autotrophic ProcessesBacteriaEukaryotaHeterotrophic ProcessesMediterranean SeaSeawaterVirusesEukaryotic phytoplanktonHeterotrophic prokaryotesProchlorococcusSynechococcusViruses

Identifiers

PMID26626911
OpenAlexW2187798210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.