Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626793›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2016

Structure-Based Prediction of Anti-infective Drug Concentrations in the Human Lung Epithelial Lining Fluid.

Pyry A J Välitalo, Koen Griffioen, Matthew L Rizk, Sandra A G Visser, Meindert Danhof, Gaori Rao, Piet H van der Graaf, J G Coen van Hasselt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Importance of Drug Pharmacokinetics at the Site of Action.Clinical and translational science · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pyry A J VälitaloDivision of Pharmacology, Cluster Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Koen GriffioenDivision of Pharmacology, Cluster Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Matthew L RizkMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Sandra A G VisserMerck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Meindert DanhofDivision of Pharmacology, Cluster Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, Netherlands.
Gaori RaoUniversity at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Piet H van der GraafDivision of Pharmacology, Cluster Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, Netherlands.
J G Coen van HasseltDivision of Pharmacology, Cluster Systems Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research (LACDR), Faculty of Science, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC, Leiden, Netherlands. jgc.vanhasselt@gmail.com.
Leiden University · NLCentre for Human Drug Research · NLMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObtaining pharmacologically relevant exposure levels of antibiotics in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) is of critical importance to ensure optimal treatment of lung infections. Our objectives were to develop a model for the prediction of the ELF-plasma concentration ratio (EPR) of antibiotics based on their chemical structure descriptors (CSDs).

methodsEPR data was obtained by aggregating ELF and plasma concentrations from historical clinical studies investigating antibiotics and associated agents. An elastic net regularized regression model was used to predict EPRs based on a large number of CSDs. The model was tuned using leave-one-drug-out cross validation, and the predictions were further evaluated using a test dataset.

resultsEPR data of 56 unique compounds was included. A high degree of variability in EPRs both between- and within drugs was apparent. No trends related to study design or pharmacokinetic factors could be identified. The model predicted 80% of the within-drug variability (R(2) WDV) and 78.6% of drugs were within 3-fold difference from the observations. Key CSDs were related to molecular size and lipophilicity. When predicting EPRs for a test dataset the R(2) WDV was 75%.

conclusionsThis model is of relevance to inform dose selection and optimization during antibiotic drug development of agents targeting lung infections.

Indexed as

Bronchoalveolar Lavage FluidAnti-Bacterial AgentsComputer SimulationHumansLungMachine LearningModels, BiologicalPneumoniaRespiratory MucosaAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticselastic netepithelial lining fluidlung infectionmachine learningmodelingpharmacokineticspneumonia

Identifiers

PMID26626793
OpenAlexW2187707217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.