ReviewBiomedical engineering online2015
Overview of technical solutions and assessment of clinical usefulness of capsule endoscopy.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy for small bowel investigation (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Children With Crohn's Disease: Manifestations and the Value of Assessing Disease Activity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Capsule Endoscopy: Pitfalls and Approaches to Overcome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Video-Capable Ultrasonic Wireless Communications Through Biological Tissues.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- 3D reconstruction of small bowel lesions using stereo camera-based capsule endoscopy.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Gastrointestinal diagnosis using non-white light imaging capsule endoscopy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Review
- A global perspective on capsule endoscopy.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Review
- Ultrasound capsule endoscopy: sounding out the future.Annals of translational medicine · 2017Article
- Recommendations to quantify villous atrophy in video capsule endoscopy images of celiac disease patients.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Article
- Device failures and patient-related adverse events with small bowel capsule endoscopy: a 20-year MAUDE database analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The paper presents an overview of endoscopic capsules with particular emphasis on technical aspects. It indicates common problems in capsule endoscopy such as: (1) limited wireless communication (2) the use of capsule endoscopy in the case of partial patency of the gastrointestinal tract, (3) limited imaging area, (4) external capsule control limitations. It also presents the prospects of capsule endoscopy, the most recent technical solutions for biopsy and the mobility of the capsule in the gastrointestinal tract. The paper shows the possibilities of increasing clinical usefulness of capsule endoscopy resulting from technological limitations. Attention has also been paid to the current role of capsule endoscopy in screening tests and the limitations of its effectiveness. The paper includes the author's recommendations concerning the direction of further research and the possibility of enhancing the scope of capsule endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.