Trial reportEuropean urology2016
Everolimus Versus Sunitinib Prospective Evaluation in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ESPN): A Randomized Multicenter Phase 2 Trial.
Trial report in European urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
172 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 358 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of systemic treatments for advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- SEOM SOGUG clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2022).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Guideline
- First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Systemic therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the second-line setting: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Kidney Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Guideline
- A Systematic Review of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cancer.Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.) · 2022Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Adjuvant Targeted Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Nivolumab for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (nccRCC): A Single-Institutional Experience and Literature Meta-Analysis.The oncologist · 2020Pooled it
- Current State of Systemic Therapies for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.Current oncology reports · 2020Pooled it
- SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of kidney cancer (2017).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018Guideline
- Pooled it
- Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Critical Evaluation.The oncologist · 2017Pooled it
- Final Overall Survival Analysis of S1500: A Randomized, Phase II Study Comparing Sunitinib With Cabozantinib, Crizotinib, and Savolitinib in Advanced Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Trial
- A Phase 2 Trial of Talazoparib and Avelumab in Genomically Defined Metastatic Kidney Cancer.European urology oncology · 2024Trial
- Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Patients with Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Updated Results from a Phase 2 Trial.European urology · 2024Trial
- Activity of Tivozanib in Non-clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Subgroup Analysis From a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial.The oncologist · 2023Trial
- Phase II Trial of Cabozantinib Plus Nivolumab in Patients With Non-Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Genomic Correlates.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Trial
- Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Trial
112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSunitinib and everolimus are standard first-line and second-line therapies, respectively, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
objectiveTo conduct a randomized phase 2 trial comparing sunitinib and everolimus in non-clear cell RCC (non-ccRCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsPatients with metastatic, non-ccRCC, or ccRCC with >20% sarcomatoid features (ccSRCC) were randomized to receive sunitinib or everolimus with crossover at disease progression. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line therapy; 108 patients were needed to show improvement in median PFS (mPFS) from 12 wk with sunitinib to 20 wk with everolimus. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Interim analysis of 68 patients (papillary [27], chromophobe [12], unclassified [10], translocation [7], ccSRCC [12]) prompted early trial closure. The mPFS in first-line therapy was 6.1 mo with sunitinib and 4.1 mo with everolimus (p=0.6); median overall survival (mOS) was not reached with sunitinib and was 10.5 mo with everolimus, respectively (p=0.014). At final analysis, mOS was 16.2 and 14.9 mo with sunitinib and everolimus, respectively (p=0.18). There were four partial responses (PRs) in first-line therapy (sunitinib: 3 of 33 [9%]; everolimus, 1 of 35 [2.8%]) and four PRs in second-line therapy (sunitinib: 2 of 21 [9.5%]; everolimus, 2 of 23 [8.6%]), with mPFS of 1.8 mo and 2.8 mo, respectively. In patients without sarcomatoid features in their tumors (n=49), mOS was 31.6 mo with sunitinib and 10.5 mo with everolimus (p=0.075). Genomic profiling of a chromophobe RCC from a patient with a PR to first-line everolimus revealed a somatic TSC2 mutation.
conclusionsIn this trial, everolimus was not superior to sunitinib. Both agents demonstrated modest efficacy, underscoring the need for better therapies in non-ccRCC. PATIENT SUMMARY: This randomized phase 2 trial provides the first head-to-head comparison of everolimus and sunitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (non-ccRCC). The observed very modest efficacy underscores the need to develop more effective therapies for non-ccRCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.