Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626322›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

The pan-genome of Lactobacillus reuteri strains originating from the pig gastrointestinal tract.

Udo Wegmann, Donald A MacKenzie, Jinshui Zheng, Alexander Goesmann, Stefan Roos, David Swarbreck, Jens Walter, Lisa C Crossman, Nathalie Juge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  10. DietaryFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  11. Selection of ImmunobioticMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Metagenomic Association Analysis of Gut SymbiontFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Complete Genome and Comparative Genome Analysis ofEvolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020
    Article
  17. Functional and Genomic Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Structural basis for the role of serine-rich repeat proteins fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Udo WegmannThe Gut Health and Food Safety Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK. udo.wegmann@ifr.ac.uk.
Donald A MacKenzieThe Gut Health and Food Safety Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK. donald.mackenzie@ifr.ac.uk.
Jinshui ZhengState Key Lab of Agricultural Microbiology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. elon1133@qq.com.
Alexander GoesmannBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Gießen, 35392, Germany. alexander.goesmann@computational.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Stefan RoosDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, S-750 07, Sweden. stefan.roos@slu.se.
David SwarbreckThe Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. david.swarbreck@tgac.ac.uk.
Jens WalterDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada. jwalter1@ualberta.ca.
Lisa C CrossmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK. l.crossman@uea.ac.uk.
Nathalie JugeThe Gut Health and Food Safety Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK. nathalie.juge@ifr.ac.uk.
Quadram Institute · GBEarlham Institute · GBHuazhong Agricultural University · CNSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004529/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K019554/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/00044452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactobacillus reuteri is a gut symbiont of a wide variety of vertebrate species that has diversified into distinct phylogenetic clades which are to a large degree host-specific. Previous work demonstrated host specificity in mice and begun to determine the mechanisms by which gut colonisation and host restriction is achieved. However, how L. reuteri strains colonise the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of pigs is unknown.

resultsTo gain insight into the ecology of L. reuteri in the pig gut, the genome sequence of the porcine small intestinal isolate L. reuteri ATCC 53608 was completed and consisted of a chromosome of 1.94 Mbp and two plasmids of 138.5 kbp and 9.09 kbp, respectively. Furthermore, we generated draft genomes of four additional L. reuteri strains isolated from pig faeces or lower GI tract, lp167-67, pg-3b, 20-2 and 3c6, and subjected all five genomes to a comparative genomic analysis together with the previously completed genome of strain I5007. A phylogenetic analysis based on whole genomes showed that porcine L. reuteri strains fall into two distinct clades, as previously suggested by multi-locus sequence analysis. These six pig L. reuteri genomes contained a core set of 1364 orthologous gene clusters, as determined by OrthoMCL analysis, that contributed to a pan-genome totalling 3373 gene clusters. Genome comparisons of the six pig L. reuteri strains with 14 L. reuteri strains from other host origins gave a total pan-genome of 5225 gene clusters that included a core genome of 851 gene clusters but revealed that there were no pig-specific genes per se. However, genes specific for and conserved among strains of the two pig phylogenetic lineages were detected, some of which encoded cell surface proteins that could contribute to the diversification of the two lineages and their observed host specificity.

conclusionsThis study extends the phylogenetic analysis of L. reuteri strains at a genome-wide level, pointing to distinct evolutionary trajectories of porcine L. reuteri lineages, and providing new insights into the genomic events in L. reuteri that occurred during specialisation to their hosts. The occurrence of two distinct pig-derived clades may reflect differences in host genotype, environmental factors such as dietary components or to evolution from ancestral strains of human and rodent origin following contact with pig populations.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsAnimalsBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion SystemsBacteriophagesBasal MetabolismChromosomes, BacterialGastrointestinal TractGene OrderGenetic StructuresGene Transfer, HorizontalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHost-Pathogen InteractionsLimosilactobacillus reuteriMultigene FamilyBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsBacterial Secretion Systems

Identifiers

PMID26626322
PMCPMC4667477
OpenAlexW2183841985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.