Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626312›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Comprehensive genotyping reveals RPE65 as the most frequently mutated gene in Leber congenital amaurosis in Denmark.

Galuh D N Astuti, Mette Bertelsen, Markus N Preising, Muhammad Ajmal, Birgit Lorenz, Sultana M H Faradz, Raheel Qamar, Rob W J Collin, Thomas Rosenberg, Frans P M Cremers

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Personalized Pathogenicity Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Restoring Sight: The Journey of AIPL1 from Discovery to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Genetics and phenotypes ofMolecular vision · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Structural Abnormalities Are Deeply Involved in the Cause ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Clinical applications of gene therapy for rare diseases: A review.International journal of experimental pathology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Galuh D N AstutiDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mette BertelsenKennedy Center Eye Clinic, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Markus N PreisingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Muhammad AjmalDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Birgit LorenzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Sultana M H FaradzDivision of Human Genetics, Center for Biomedical Research (CEBIOR), Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Raheel QamarDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Science, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rob W J CollinDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas RosenbergKennedy Center Eye Clinic, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Frans P M CremersDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKUniversity of Giessen · DEDiponegoro University · IDGlostrup Hospital · DKKennedy Center · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) represents the most severe form of inherited retinal dystrophies with an onset during the first year of life. Currently, 21 genes are known to be associated with LCA and recurrent mutations have been observed in AIPL1, CEP290, CRB1 and GUCY2D. In addition, sequence analysis of LRAT and RPE65 may be important in view of treatments that are emerging for patients carrying variants in these genes. Screening of the aforementioned variants and genes was performed in 64 Danish LCA probands. Upon the identification of heterozygous variants, Sanger sequencing was performed of the relevant genes to identify the second allele. In combination with prior arrayed primer extension analysis, this led to the identification of two variants in 42 of 86 cases (49%). Remarkably, biallelic RPE65 variants were identified in 16% of the cases, and one novel variant, p.(D110G), was found in seven RPE65 alleles. We also collected all previously published RPE65 variants, identified in 914 alleles of 539 patients with LCA or early-onset retinitis pigmentosa, and deposited them in the RPE65 Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). The in silico pathogenicity assessment of the missense and noncanonical splice site variants, as well as an analysis of their frequency in ~60 000 control individuals, rendered 864 of the alleles to affect function or probably affect function. This comprehensive database can now be used to select patients eligible for gene augmentation or retinoid supplementation therapies.

Indexed as

Mutation RateAdultChildcis-trans-IsomerasesDenmarkFemaleHeterozygoteHumansInfantLeber Congenital AmaurosisMaleMutation, MissensePedigreeRetinoid IsomerohydrolaseRNA Splicingcis-trans-IsomerasesRetinoid Isomerohydrolase

Identifiers

PMID26626312
PMCPMC5070892
OpenAlexW2193754702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.