ArticleBMC genomics2015
Accuracy of genomic selection for alfalfa biomass yield in different reference populations.
Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and deployment of a public mid-density genotyping panel for crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.) based on whole-genome re-sequencing of diverse germplasm.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Genomic selection in timothy (Phleum pratense L.): a comprehensive evaluation of prediction models, multi-trait strategies, and forward validation across Norwegian environments.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Enhancing alfalfa breeding through genomic prediction with exotic germplasm resources.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the genetic diversity of the IPK Medicago germplasm collection using GBS.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Article
- MoEGP: an efficient crop genomic prediction approach based on the mixture of experts network.Plant methods · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and genomic insights into alfalfa diversity: Identifying critical loci for enhanced resilience.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Article
- Recent advances in breeding systems and their improvement in forage crops.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- QTL detection and genomic prediction for resistance to anthracnose in alfalfa (Medicago sativa).The plant genome · 2025Article
- Forage Crop Research in the Modern Age.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Optimization of high-throughput marker systems for genomic prediction in alfalfa family bulks.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic selection shows improved expected genetic gain over phenotypic selection of agronomic traits in allotetraploid white clover.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction of Alfalfa (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The whole-genome dissection of root system architecture provides new insights for the genetic improvement of alfalfa (Horticulture research · 2025Article
- TrG2P: A transfer-learning-based tool integrating multi-trait data for accurate prediction of crop yield.Plant communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Crop Landraces and Indigenous Varieties: A Valuable Source of Genes for Plant Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effects of SNP marker density and training population size on prediction accuracy in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genomic selection.The plant genome · 2024Article
- A marker weighting approach for enhancing within-family accuracy in genomic prediction.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic selection based on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data could accelerate alfalfa yield gains, if it displayed moderate ability to predict parent breeding values. Its interest would be enhanced by predicting ability also for germplasm/reference populations other than those for which it was defined. Predicting accuracy may be influenced by statistical models, SNP calling procedures and missing data imputation strategies.
resultsLandrace and variety material from two genetically-contrasting reference populations, i.e., 124 elite genotypes adapted to the Po Valley (sub-continental climate; PV population) and 154 genotypes adapted to Mediterranean-climate environments (Me population), were genotyped by GBS and phenotyped in separate environments for dry matter yield of their dense-planted half-sib progenies. Both populations showed no sub-population genetic structure. Predictive accuracy was higher by joint rather than separate SNP calling for the two data sets, and using random forest imputation of missing data. Highest accuracy was obtained using Support Vector Regression (SVR) for PV, and Ridge Regression BLUP and SVR for Me germplasm. Bayesian methods (Bayes A, Bayes B and Bayesian Lasso) tended to be less accurate. Random Forest Regression was the least accurate model. Accuracy attained about 0.35 for Me in the range of 0.30-0.50 missing data, and 0.32 for PV at 0.50 missing data, using at least 10,000 SNP markers. Cross-population predictions based on a smaller subset of common SNPs implied a relative loss of accuracy of about 25% for Me and 30% for PV. Genome-wide association analyses based on large subsets of M. truncatula-aligned markers revealed many SNPs with modest association with yield, and some genome areas hosting putative QTLs. A comparison of genomic vs. conventional selection for parent breeding value assuming 1-year vs. 5-year selection cycles, respectively, indicated over three-fold greater predicted yield gain per unit time for genomic selection.
conclusionsGenomic selection for alfalfa yield is promising, based on its moderate prediction accuracy, moderate value of cross-population predictions, and lack of sub-population structure. There is limited scope for searching individual QTLs with overwhelming effect on yield. Some of our results can contribute to better design of genomic selection experiments for alfalfa and other crops with similar mating systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.