Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626170›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Accuracy of genomic selection for alfalfa biomass yield in different reference populations.

Paolo Annicchiarico, Nelson Nazzicari, Xuehui Li, Yanling Wei, Luciano Pecetti, E Charles Brummer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Forage Crop Research in the Modern Age.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome-Wide Association and Genomic Prediction of Alfalfa (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo AnnicchiaricoCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions, 29 viale Piacenza, 26900, Lodi, Italy. paolo.annicchiarico@entecra.it.
Nelson NazzicariCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions, 29 viale Piacenza, 26900, Lodi, Italy. nelson.nazzicari@entecra.it.
Xuehui LiDepartment of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, 1340 Administration Avenue, Fargo, ND, 58108, USA. xuehui.li@ndsu.edu.
Yanling WeiPlant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, Plant Breeding Center, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. yweigalee@gmail.com.
Luciano PecettiCouncil for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Productions, 29 viale Piacenza, 26900, Lodi, Italy. luciano.pecetti@entecra.it.
E Charles BrummerPlant Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, Plant Breeding Center, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. ecbrummer@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic selection based on genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data could accelerate alfalfa yield gains, if it displayed moderate ability to predict parent breeding values. Its interest would be enhanced by predicting ability also for germplasm/reference populations other than those for which it was defined. Predicting accuracy may be influenced by statistical models, SNP calling procedures and missing data imputation strategies.

resultsLandrace and variety material from two genetically-contrasting reference populations, i.e., 124 elite genotypes adapted to the Po Valley (sub-continental climate; PV population) and 154 genotypes adapted to Mediterranean-climate environments (Me population), were genotyped by GBS and phenotyped in separate environments for dry matter yield of their dense-planted half-sib progenies. Both populations showed no sub-population genetic structure. Predictive accuracy was higher by joint rather than separate SNP calling for the two data sets, and using random forest imputation of missing data. Highest accuracy was obtained using Support Vector Regression (SVR) for PV, and Ridge Regression BLUP and SVR for Me germplasm. Bayesian methods (Bayes A, Bayes B and Bayesian Lasso) tended to be less accurate. Random Forest Regression was the least accurate model. Accuracy attained about 0.35 for Me in the range of 0.30-0.50 missing data, and 0.32 for PV at 0.50 missing data, using at least 10,000 SNP markers. Cross-population predictions based on a smaller subset of common SNPs implied a relative loss of accuracy of about 25% for Me and 30% for PV. Genome-wide association analyses based on large subsets of M. truncatula-aligned markers revealed many SNPs with modest association with yield, and some genome areas hosting putative QTLs. A comparison of genomic vs. conventional selection for parent breeding value assuming 1-year vs. 5-year selection cycles, respectively, indicated over three-fold greater predicted yield gain per unit time for genomic selection.

conclusionsGenomic selection for alfalfa yield is promising, based on its moderate prediction accuracy, moderate value of cross-population predictions, and lack of sub-population structure. There is limited scope for searching individual QTLs with overwhelming effect on yield. Some of our results can contribute to better design of genomic selection experiments for alfalfa and other crops with similar mating systems.

Indexed as

BiomassGenetics, PopulationGenome, PlantSelection, GeneticBreedingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeMedicago sativaModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26626170
PMCPMC4667460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.