Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626037›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016

Many Phenotypes Without Many False Discoveries: Error Controlling Strategies for Multitrait Association Studies.

Christine B Peterson, Marina Bogomolov, Yoav Benjamini, Chiara Sabatti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Short-term exposure to filter-bubble recommendation systems has limited polarization effects: Naturalistic experiments on YouTube.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Political diversity in U.S. police agencies.American journal of political science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Finding New Cell Wall Regulatory Genes inFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine B PetersonDepartment of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Marina BogomolovFaculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Yoav BenjaminiDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Chiara SabattiDepartment of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

Genetic Regulation of Gene Expression and its Impact on Phenotypes - SupplementR01MH101782 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SABATTI, CHIARA · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
New Statistical Methods for High Resolution Mapping of Multiple PhenotypesR01HG006695 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SABATTI, CHIARA · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG006695NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006695NIMH NIH HHS MH101782NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic basis of multiple phenotypes such as gene expression, metabolite levels, or imaging features is often investigated by testing a large collection of hypotheses, probing the existence of association between each of the traits and hundreds of thousands of genotyped variants. Appropriate multiplicity adjustment is crucial to guarantee replicability of findings, and the false discovery rate (FDR) is frequently adopted as a measure of global error. In the interest of interpretability, results are often summarized so that reporting focuses on variants discovered to be associated to some phenotypes. We show that applying FDR-controlling procedures on the entire collection of hypotheses fails to control the rate of false discovery of associated variants as well as the expected value of the average proportion of false discovery of phenotypes influenced by such variants. We propose a simple hierarchical testing procedure that allows control of both these error rates and provides a more reliable basis for the identification of variants with functional effects. We demonstrate the utility of this approach through simulation studies comparing various error rates and measures of power for genetic association studies of multiple traits. Finally, we apply the proposed method to identify genetic variants that impact flowering phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana, expanding the set of discoveries.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesArabidopsisComputer SimulationFlowersGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of Resultserror controlfalse discovery rategenetic association studymultiple hypothesis testingmultiple phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID26626037
PMCPMC4738479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.