Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26626016›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2015

Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi.

Randy G Mungwira, Wongani Nyangulu, James Misiri, Steven Iphani, Ruby Ng'ong'ola, Chawanangwa M Chirambo, Francis Masiye, Joseph Mfutso-Bengo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Randy G MungwiraCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. rgmungwira@gmail.com.
Wongani NyanguluCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. wnyangulu@gmail.com.
James MisiriCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. jamesmisiri@gmail.com.
Steven IphaniCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. iphanisteven@gmail.com.
Ruby Ng'ong'olaCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. tionenji2001@yahoo.co.uk.
Chawanangwa M ChiramboCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Master of Public Health Bioethics Major Students, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. mahebere.chirambo@gmail.com.
Francis MasiyeDepartment of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa. fmasiye@medcol.mw.
Joseph Mfutso-BengoCollege of Medicine, School of Public Health, Center for Bioethics, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. mfutsobengo@medcol.mw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper discusses the contentious issue of reuse of stored biological samples and data obtained from research participants in past clinical research to answer future ethical and scientifically valid research questions. Many countries have regulations and guidelines that guide the use and exportation of stored biological samples and data. However, there are variations in regulations and guidelines governing the reuse of stored biological samples and data in Sub-Saharan Africa including Malawi. DISCUSSION: The current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi do not allow indefinite storage and reuse of biological samples and data for future unspecified research. This comes even though the country has managed to answer pertinent research questions using stored biological samples and data. We acknowledge the limited technical expertise and equipment unavailable in Malawi that necessitates exportation of biological samples and data and the genuine concern raised by the regulatory authorities about the possible exploitation of biological samples and data by researchers. We also acknowledge that Malawi does not have bio-banks for storing biological samples and data for future research purposes. This creates room for possible exploitation of biological samples and data collected from research participants in primary research projects in Malawi. However, research ethics committees require completion and approval of material transfer agreements and data transfer agreements for biological samples and data collected for research purposes respectively and this requirement may partly address the concern raised by the regulatory authorities. Our concern though is that there is no such requirement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes. In conclusion, we propose developing a medical data and material transfer agreement for biological samples and data collected from patients for clinical or diagnostic purposes in both public and private health facilities that may end up in research centers outside Malawi. We also propose revision of the current research ethics regulations and guidelines in Malawi in order to allow secondary use of biological samples and data collected from primary research projects as a way of maximizing the use of collected samples and data. Finally, we call for consultation of all stakeholders within the Malawi research community when regulatory authorities are developing policies that govern research in Malawi.

Indexed as

Ethics Committees, ResearchTissue BanksBiomedical ResearchClinical ProtocolsEthics, ResearchGuidelines as TopicHumansInformed ConsentMalawiResearch PersonnelResearch SubjectsSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID26626016
PMCPMC4667408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.