Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26625977›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2016

Patching Broken DNA: Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA Breaks.

Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu, Nealia House, Brendan D Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. High Molecular Crowding in Repair Foci Surrounding DNA Breaks, Measured by Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cryo-EM structures reveal the acetylation process of piccolo NuA4.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. The translatome of glioblastoma.Molecular oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ozge Gursoy-YuzugulluDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02132, USA.
Nealia HouseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02132, USA.
Brendan D PriceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02132, USA. Electronic address: brendan_price@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

RADIATION MODULATION OF THE P53 GENER01CA064585 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI PRICE, BRENDAN D · 1995 to 2016
$4.6M
Functional Analysis of the Tip60 ComplexR01CA093602 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI PRICE, BRENDAN D · 2002 to 2018
$4.3M
Nucleosome Dynamics and the Repair of DNA DamageR01CA177884 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PRICE, BRENDAN D · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA064585NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093602NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of cells to detect and repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is dependent on reorganization of the surrounding chromatin structure by chromatin remodeling complexes. These complexes promote access to the site of DNA damage, facilitate processing of the damaged DNA and, importantly, are essential to repackage the repaired DNA. Here, we will review the chromatin remodeling steps that occur immediately after DSB production and that prepare the damaged chromatin template for processing by the DSB repair machinery. DSBs promote rapid accumulation of repressive complexes, including HP1, the NuRD complex, H2A.Z and histone methyltransferases at the DSB. This shift to a repressive chromatin organization may be important to inhibit local transcription and limit mobility of the break and to maintain the DNA ends in close contact. Subsequently, the repressive chromatin is rapidly dismantled through a mechanism involving dynamic exchange of the histone variant H2A.Z. H2A.Z removal at DSBs alters the acidic patch on the nucleosome surface, promoting acetylation of the H4 tail (by the NuA4-Tip60 complex) and shifting the chromatin to a more open structure. Further, H2A.Z removal promotes chromatin ubiquitination and recruitment of additional DSB repair proteins to the break. Modulation of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome function during DSB repair therefore plays a vital role in processing of DNA breaks. Further, the nucleosome surface may function as a central hub during DSB repair, directing specific patterns of histone modification, recruiting DNA repair proteins and modulating chromatin packing during processing of the damaged DNA template.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA Repair EnzymesModels, BiologicalMultienzyme ComplexesNucleosomesDNA Repair EnzymesMultienzyme ComplexesNucleosomeschromatin remodelingDNA damageDSB repairH2A.ZNuA4-Tip60

Identifiers

PMID26625977
PMCPMC4860187
OpenAlexW2179097847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.