ArticleAcademic radiology2016
Patient-directed Internet-based Medical Image Exchange: Experience from an Initial Multicenter Implementation.
Article in Academic radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Digital patient journey after radiological diagnostics : Patient portals-what comes after the examination?]Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- The RSNA ImageShare - Enabling Secure, Transparent, and Easy Image Exchange.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- How Image Exchange Breaks Down: the Image Library Perspective.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Multi-institutional Experience with Patient Image Access Through Electronic Health Record Patient Portals.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Radiology, Mobile Devices, and Internet of Things (IoT).Journal of digital imaging · 2020Review
- The Enterprise Imaging Value Proposition.Journal of digital imaging · 2020Review
- Patient Attitudes About Viewing Their Radiology Images Online: Preintervention Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Data Engineering for Machine Learning in Women's Imaging and Beyond.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesInefficient transfer of personal health records among providers negatively impacts quality of health care and increases cost. This multicenter study evaluates the implementation of the first Internet-based image-sharing system that gives patients ownership and control of their imaging exams, including assessment of patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients receiving any medical imaging exams in four academic centers were eligible to have images uploaded into an online, Internet-based personal health record. Satisfaction surveys were provided during recruitment with questions on ease of use, privacy and security, and timeliness of access to images. Responses were rated on a five-point scale and compared using logistic regression and McNemar's test.
resultsA total of 2562 patients enrolled from July 2012 to August 2013. The median number of imaging exams uploaded per patient was 5. Most commonly, exams were plain X-rays (34.7%), computed tomography (25.7%), and magnetic resonance imaging (16.1%). Of 502 (19.6%) patient surveys returned, 448 indicated the method of image sharing (Internet, compact discs [CDs], both, other). Nearly all patients (96.5%) responded favorably to having direct access to images, and 78% reported viewing their medical images independently. There was no difference between Internet and CD users in satisfaction with privacy and security and timeliness of access to medical images. A greater percentage of Internet users compared to CD users reported access without difficulty (88.3% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.0001).
conclusionA patient-directed, interoperable, Internet-based image-sharing system is feasible and surpasses the use of CDs with respect to accessibility of imaging exams while generating similar satisfaction with respect to privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.