Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26624895›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Learning Predictive Interactions Using Information Gain and Bayesian Network Scoring.

Xia Jiang, Jeremy Jao, Richard Neapolitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. New Algorithm and Software (BNOmics) for Inferring and Visualizing Bayesian Networks from Heterogeneous Big Biological and Genetic Data.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xia JiangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
Jeremy JaoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America.
Richard NeapolitanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States of America.

Funding

A New Generation Clinical Decision Support SystemR01LM011663 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JIANG, XIA, NEAPOLITAN, RICHARD E · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Detecting Genome Wide Epistasis with Efficient Bayesian Network LearningR00LM010822 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JIANG, XIA · 2012 to 2014
$565k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010822NLM NIH HHS R00LM010822NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011663NLM NIH HHS R01LM011663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe problems of correlation and classification are long-standing in the fields of statistics and machine learning, and techniques have been developed to address these problems. We are now in the era of high-dimensional data, which is data that can concern billions of variables. These data present new challenges. In particular, it is difficult to discover predictive variables, when each variable has little marginal effect. An example concerns Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) datasets, which involve millions of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), where some of the SNPs interact epistatically to affect disease status. Towards determining these interacting SNPs, researchers developed techniques that addressed this specific problem. However, the problem is more general, and so these techniques are applicable to other problems concerning interactions. A difficulty with many of these techniques is that they do not distinguish whether a learned interaction is actually an interaction or whether it involves several variables with strong marginal effects. METHODOLOGY/

findingsWe address this problem using information gain and Bayesian network scoring. First, we identify candidate interactions by determining whether together variables provide more information than they do separately. Then we use Bayesian network scoring to see if a candidate interaction really is a likely model. Our strategy is called MBS-IGain. Using 100 simulated datasets and a real GWAS Alzheimer's dataset, we investigated the performance of MBS-IGain. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: When analyzing the simulated datasets, MBS-IGain substantially out-performed nine previous methods at locating interacting predictors, and at identifying interactions exactly. When analyzing the real Alzheimer's dataset, we obtained new results and results that substantiated previous findings. We conclude that MBS-IGain is highly effective at finding interactions in high-dimensional datasets. This result is significant because we have increasingly abundant high-dimensional data in many domains, and to learn causes and perform prediction/classification using these data, we often must first identify interactions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputational BiologyGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID26624895
PMCPMC4666609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.