Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26624623›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development and Validation of a Gene-Based Model for Outcome Prediction in Germ Cell Tumors Using a Combined Genomic and Expression Profiling Approach.

James E Korkola, Sandy Heck, Adam B Olshen, Darren R Feldman, Victor E Reuter, Jane Houldsworth, George J Bosl, R S K Chaganti

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bioengineered · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Testicular germ cell tumor genomics.Current opinion in urology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James E KorkolaCell Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York, United States of America.
Sandy HeckDepartments of Medicine and Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.
Adam B OlshenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Darren R FeldmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Jane HouldsworthCell Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York, United States of America.
George J BoslDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
R S K ChagantiCell Biology Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research, New York, New York, United States of America.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKettering University · USCornell University · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) have a high cure rate, but we currently lack the ability to accurately identify the small subset of patients who will die from their disease. We used a combined genomic and expression profiling approach to identify genomic regions and underlying genes that are predictive of outcome in GCT patients. We performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on 53 non-seminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy and defined altered genomic regions using Circular Binary Segmentation. We identified 14 regions associated with two year disease-free survival (2yDFS) and 16 regions associated with five year disease-specific survival (5yDSS). From corresponding expression data, we identified 101 probe sets that showed significant changes in expression. We built several models based on these differentially expressed genes, then tested them in an independent validation set of 54 NSGCTs. These predictive models correctly classified outcome in 64-79.6% of patients in the validation set, depending on the endpoint utilized. Survival analysis demonstrated a significant separation of patients with good versus poor predicted outcome when using a combined gene set model. Multivariate analysis using clinical risk classification with the combined gene model indicated that they were independent prognostic markers. This novel set of predictive genes from altered genomic regions is almost entirely independent of our previously identified set of predictive genes for patients with NSGCTs. These genes may aid in the identification of the small subset of patients who are at high risk of poor outcome.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenomicsModels, StatisticalComparative Genomic HybridizationDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Copy Number VariationsHumansNeoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal

Identifiers

PMID26624623
PMCPMC4666461
OpenAlexW2258535666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.