ArticlePloS one2015
Development and Validation of a Gene-Based Model for Outcome Prediction in Germ Cell Tumors Using a Combined Genomic and Expression Profiling Approach.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective analysis of testicular seminoma toxicity and mechanisms of acetyl tributyl citrate using network toxicology, bulk RNA sequencing data, single-cell RNA sequencing data, and clinical data.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Integrated genomic analysis reveals aberrations in WNT signaling in germ cell tumors of childhood and adolescence.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Teratomatous Elements in Orchiectomy Specimens Are Associated with a Reduced Relapse-Free Survival in Metastasized Testicular Germ Cell Tumors.Urologia internationalis · 2022Article
- Hypomethylation-driven AKT Serine/Threonine Kinase 3 promotes testicular germ cell tumors proliferation and negatively correlates to immune infiltration.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Thoracic Metastasectomy in Germ Cell Tumor Patients Treated With First-line Versus Salvage Therapy.The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2021Article
- ASF1B Promotes Oncogenesis in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Other Cancer Types.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Development of prediction models for the sensitivity of oral squamous cell carcinomas to preoperative S-1 administration.Heliyon · 2020Article
- Immune-related genes play an important role in the prognosis of patients with testicular germ cell tumor.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- GCNA Preserves Genome Integrity and Fertility Across Species.Developmental cell · 2020Article
- Identification of testicular cancer driver genes by a cross-species comparative oncology approach.Andrology · 2019Article
- The role of zyxin in regulation of malignancies.Heliyon · 2018Review
- Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IB Germ Cell Tumors: One versus Two Cycles of BEP.Advances in urology · 2018Review
- Testicular germ cell tumor genomics.Current opinion in urology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Germ Cell Tumors (GCT) have a high cure rate, but we currently lack the ability to accurately identify the small subset of patients who will die from their disease. We used a combined genomic and expression profiling approach to identify genomic regions and underlying genes that are predictive of outcome in GCT patients. We performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) on 53 non-seminomatous GCTs (NSGCTs) treated with cisplatin based chemotherapy and defined altered genomic regions using Circular Binary Segmentation. We identified 14 regions associated with two year disease-free survival (2yDFS) and 16 regions associated with five year disease-specific survival (5yDSS). From corresponding expression data, we identified 101 probe sets that showed significant changes in expression. We built several models based on these differentially expressed genes, then tested them in an independent validation set of 54 NSGCTs. These predictive models correctly classified outcome in 64-79.6% of patients in the validation set, depending on the endpoint utilized. Survival analysis demonstrated a significant separation of patients with good versus poor predicted outcome when using a combined gene set model. Multivariate analysis using clinical risk classification with the combined gene model indicated that they were independent prognostic markers. This novel set of predictive genes from altered genomic regions is almost entirely independent of our previously identified set of predictive genes for patients with NSGCTs. These genes may aid in the identification of the small subset of patients who are at high risk of poor outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.