Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26624564›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

Diet quality of cancer survivors and noncancer individuals: Results from a national survey.

Fang Fang Zhang, Shanshan Liu, Esther M John, Aviva Must, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dietary intervention among young cancer survivors within the CARE for CAYA program.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fang Fang ZhangDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shanshan LiuDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Esther M JohnCancer Prevention Institute of California, San Francisco, California.
Aviva MustDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Tufts University · USCancer Prevention Institute of California · USJean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Transgenic CoreP30DK046200 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREENBERG, ANDREW S, PERISSI, VALENTINA · 1992 to 2021
$25.0M
TUFTS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATION SCIENCE INSTITUTE (UL1): BPCAUL1RR025752 · NCRR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2008 to 2011
$17.6M
Effect of Aging on Preadipocyte DifferentiationR37AG013925 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KIRKLAND, JAMES L. · 2016 to 2025
$6.6M
Tufts Clinical and Translation Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000073 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2012 to 2013
$5.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000073NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025752NIA NIH HHS R37 AG013925NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK046200NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK46200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatterns of poor nutritional intake may exacerbate the elevated morbidity experienced by cancer survivors. It remains unclear whether cancer survivors adhere to existing dietary guidelines and whether survivors' diets differ from those of individuals without cancer over the long term.

methodsThe authors evaluated dietary intake and quality in 1533 adult cancer survivors who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2010 compared with dietary intake and quality in 3075 individuals who had no history of cancer and were matched to the cancer survivors by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-hour dietary recalls. The 2010 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2010) was used to evaluate diet quality.

resultsThe mean ± standard deviation HEI-2010 total score was 47.2 ± 0.5 in the cancer survivors and 48.3 ± 0.4 in the noncancer group (P = .03). Compared with the noncancer group, cancer survivors had a significantly lower score for empty calories (13.6 vs 14.4; P = .001), which corresponded to worse adherence to dietary intake of calories from solid fats, alcohol, and added sugars. Cancer survivors also had significantly lower dietary intake of fiber than the noncancer group (15.0 vs 15.9 g per day; P = .02). In relation to recommended intake, survivors' mean dietary intake of vitamin D, vitamin E, potassium, fiber, and calcium was 31%, 47%, 55%, 60%, and 73%, respectively; whereas their mean dietary intake of saturated fat and sodium was 112% and 133%, respectively, of the recommended intake.

conclusionsCancer survivors had poor adherence to the US Department of Agriculture 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and their intake patterns were worse than those in the general population for empty calories and fiber.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAdultAgedDietary FiberFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition AssessmentSurvivorsUnited StatesYoung AdultDietary Fibercancer survivorsdiet qualityNational Health and Nutrition Examination Surveynutritionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID26624564
PMCPMC4667562
OpenAlexW1930609842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.