Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26624011›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Automated Learning of Subcellular Variation among Punctate Protein Patterns and a Generative Model of Their Relation to Microtubules.

Gregory R Johnson, Jieyue Li, Aabid Shariff, Gustavo K Rohde, Robert F Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Self-Supervised Voxel-Level Representation Rediscovers Subcellular Structures in Volume Electron Microscopy.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Point process models for localization and interdependence of punctate cellular structures.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2016
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Visualizing quantitative microscopy data: History and challenges.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory R JohnsonComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jieyue LiCenter for Bioimage Informatics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Aabid ShariffComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gustavo K RohdeComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Robert F MurphyComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Integrated Interdisciplinary, inter-university PhD Program Computational Biology (T32)T32EB009403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$4.4M
Image-derived Spatiotemporal Models of Cellular Organization and PerturbationR01GM090033 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, ROBERT F, ROHDE, GUSTAVO KUNDE · 2010 to 2018
$2.4M
BUILDING AND VALIDATING LOCATION PROTEOMICS DATABASESR01GM075205 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, ROBERT F · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB009403NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009403NIGMS NIH HHS GM075205NIGMS NIH HHS GM090033NIGMS NIH HHS GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing the spatial distribution of proteins directly from microscopy images is a difficult problem with numerous applications in cell biology (e.g. identifying motor-related proteins) and clinical research (e.g. identification of cancer biomarkers). Here we describe the design of a system that provides automated analysis of punctate protein patterns in microscope images, including quantification of their relationships to microtubules. We constructed the system using confocal immunofluorescence microscopy images from the Human Protein Atlas project for 11 punctate proteins in three cultured cell lines. These proteins have previously been characterized as being primarily located in punctate structures, but their images had all been annotated by visual examination as being simply "vesicular". We were able to show that these patterns could be distinguished from each other with high accuracy, and we were able to assign to one of these subclasses hundreds of proteins whose subcellular localization had not previously been well defined. In addition to providing these novel annotations, we built a generative approach to modeling of punctate distributions that captures the essential characteristics of the distinct patterns. Such models are expected to be valuable for representing and summarizing each pattern and for constructing systems biology simulations of cell behaviors.

Indexed as

Cell LineDatabases, ProteinHumansIntracellular SpaceMachine LearningMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalProteinsSystems BiologyProteins

Identifiers

PMID26624011
PMCPMC4704559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.