Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26623646›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Live Bird Exposure among the General Public, Guangzhou, China, May 2013.

Qiuyan Liao, Jun Yuan, Eric H Y Lau, Guang Yan Chen, Zhi Cong Yang, Xiao Wei Ma, Jian Dong Chen, Yan Hui Liu, Chang Wang, Xiao Ping Tang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Qiuyan LiaoSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Jun YuanGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Eric H Y LauSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Guang Yan ChenPanyu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhi Cong YangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Wei MaGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jian Dong ChenGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yan Hui LiuGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Chang WangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Ping TangThe Eighth People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yu Fei LiuGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhuoThe Eighth People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Gabriel M LeungSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Wei ZhangGuangdong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Benjamin J CowlingSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
Ming WangGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Richard FieldingSchool of Public Health, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA novel avian-origin influenza A(H7N9) caused a major outbreak in Mainland China in early 2013. Exposure to live poultry was believed to be the major route of infection. There are limited data on how the general public changes their practices regarding live poultry exposure in response to the early outbreak of this novel influenza and the frequency of population exposure to live poultry in different areas of China. METHODOLOGY: This study investigated population exposures to live birds from various sources during the outbreak of H7N9 in Guangzhou city, China in 2013 and compared them with those observed during the 2006 influenza A(H5N1) outbreak. Adults were telephone-interviewed using two-stage sampling, stratified by three residential areas of Guangzhou: urban areas and two semi-rural areas in one of which (Zengcheng) A(H7N9) virus was detected in a chicken from wet markets. Logistic regression models were built to describe practices protecting against avian influenza, weighted by age and gender, and then compare these practices across residential areas in 2013 with those from a comparable 2006 survey. PRINCIPAL

findingsOf 1196 respondents, 45% visited wet markets at least daily and 22.0% reported buying live birds from wet markets at least weekly in April-May, 2013, after the H7N9 epidemic was officially declared in late March 2013. Of those buying live birds, 32.3% reported touching birds when buying and 13.7% would slaughter the poultry at home. Although only 10.1% of the respondents reported raising backyard birds, 92.1% of those who did so had physical contact with the birds they raised. Zengcheng respondents were less likely to report buying live birds from wet markets, but more likely to buy from other sources when compared to urban respondents. Compared with the 2006 survey, the prevalence of buying live birds from wet markets, touching when buying and slaughtering birds at home had substantially declined in the 2013 survey. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Although population exposures to live poultry were substantially fewer in 2013 compared to 2006, wet markets and backyard poultry remained the two major sources of live bird exposures for the public in Guangzhou in 2013. Zengcheng residents seemed to have reduced buying live birds from wet markets but not from other sources in response to the detection of H7N9 virus in wet markets.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsChinaEnvironmental ExposureHumansInfluenza A Virus, H7N9 SubtypePoultryRisk-TakingSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26623646
PMCPMC4666652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.