Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26623442›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2015

Diversity of approaches in assessment of executive functions in stroke: limited evidence?

Juliana Conti, Annette Sterr, Sônia Maria Dozzi Brucki, Adriana B Conforto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Clinician's Commentary on Guitar et al.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliana ContiNeurostimulation Laboratory, Neurology Clinical Division. Hospital das Clínicas/Sao Paulo University.
Annette SterrSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK and Visiting Professor, Neurostimulation Laboratory.
Sônia Maria Dozzi BruckiNeurology Clinical Division. Hospital das Clínicas/Sao Paulo University.
Adriana B ConfortoNeurostimulation Laboratory, Neurology Clinical Division. Hospital das Clínicas/Sao Paulo University ; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Combined brain and peripheral nerve stimulation to enhance beneficial effects ofR01NS076348 · NINDS · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI CONFORTO, ADRIANA B · 2012 to 2015
$441k
Novel strategies for stroke rehabilitation (planning grant)D71TW009132 · FIC · FUNDACAO FACULDADE DE MEDICINA · PI CONFORTO, ADRIANA B · 2011 to 2012
$58k
FIC NIH HHS D71 TW009132NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Cognitive functions and, in particular, executive function, are commonly affected after stroke, leading to impairments in performance of daily activities, decrease in social participation and in quality of life. Appropriate assessment and understanding of executive dysfunction are important, firstly to develop better rehabilitation strategies for executive functions per se and secondly to consider executive function abilities on rehabilitation strategies in general. The purpose of this review was to identify the most widely used assessment tools of executive dysfunction for patients with stroke, and their psychometric properties. We systematically reviewed manuscripts published in English in databases from 1999 to 2015. We identified 35 publications. The most frequently used instruments were the Stroop, Digit Span and Trail making tests. Psychometric properties were described for the Executive Function Performance Test, Executive Clock Drawing Task, Chinese Frontal Assessment Battery and Virtual Action Planning - Supermarket, and two subtests of the Cambridge Cognitive Examination - Revised. There is a paucity of tools to reliably measure executive dysfunction after stroke, despite the fact that executive dysfunction is frequent. Identification of the best tools for executive dysfunction assessment is necessary to address important gaps in research and in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cognitionevaluation methodologyexecutive functionStroke

Identifiers

PMID26623442
PMCPMC4662603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.