ReviewOpen veterinary journal2014
Fosfomycin: Uses and potentialities in veterinary medicine.
Review in Open veterinary journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fosfomycin Resistance: An Update on the Anthropogenic Impact Through Agriculture.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Whole-genome analysis of fiveMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics cut-off determination for fosfomycin using Monte Carlo simulation in healthy horses.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2024Article
- Approaching pathogenicbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Structural Studies ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Plasma and Urine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Fosfomycin Tromethamine in Dogs.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Fosfomycin Resistance in Bacteria Isolated from Companion Animals (Dogs and Cats).Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Prevalence ofVeterinary world · 2023Article
- Pervasive Selection for Clinically Relevant Resistance and Media Adaptive Mutations at Very Low Antibiotic Concentrations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Combining analytical epidemiology and genomic surveillance to identify risk factors associated with the spread of antimicrobial resistance inMicrobial genomics · 2022Article
- Rural Raccoons (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Genomic Analysis of GlobalFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- An enolase inhibitor for the targeted treatment of ENO1-deleted cancers.Nature metabolism · 2020Article
- Mobile fosfomycin resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae-An increasing threat.MicrobiologyOpen · 2020Review
- Fosfomycin and Staphylococcus aureus: transcriptomic approach to assess effect on biofilm, and fate of unattached cells.The Journal of antibiotics · 2020Article
- Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Across Salmonella enterica Isolates from Animal and Nonanimal Foods.Journal of food protection · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fosfomycin (FOS) is a natural bactericidal broad-spectrum antibiotic which acts on proliferating bacteria by inhibiting cell wall and early murein/peptidoglycan synthesis. Bactericidal activity is evident against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria and can also act synergistically with other antibiotics. Bacterial resistance to FOS may be natural or acquired. Other properties of this drug include inhibition of bacterial adhesion to epithelial cells, exopolysaccharide biofilm penetration, immunomodulatory effect, phagocytosis promotion and protection against the nephrotoxicity caused by other drugs. FOS has chemical characteristics not typically observed in organic phosphoric compounds and its molecular weight is almost the lowest of all the antimicrobials. It tends to form salts easily due to its acidic nature (disodium salt, for intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) administration; calcium and trometamol salt: for oral (PO) administration). FOS has a very low protein binding (<0.5%) which, along with its low molecular weight and water solubility, contributes to its good diffusion into fluids (cerebrospinal fluid, aqueous and vitreous humor, interstitial fluid) and tissues (placenta, bone, muscle, liver, kidney and skin/fat). In all species, important differences in the bioavailability have been found after administration in relation to the various derivatives of FOS salts. Pharmacokinetic profiles have been described in humans, chickens, rabbits, cows, dogs, horses and weaning piglets. The low toxicity and potential efficacy of FOS are the main factors that contribute to its use in humans and animals. Thus, it has been used to treat a broad variety of bacterial infections in humans, such as localized peritonitis, brain abscesses, severe soft tissue infections, cystitis and other conditions. In veterinary medicine, FOS is used to treat infectious diseases of broiler chickens and pigs. In broilers, it is administered for the treatment of E. coli and Salmonella spp. infections. In piglets, the drug is prescribed to treat a wide variety of bacterial infections. FOS penetration is demonstrated in phagocytic, respiratory (HEP-2) and intestinal (IPEC-J2) cells. Although not widely used in animals, the drug has shown good results in human medicine. The potentialities of FOS suggest that this drug is a promising candidate for the treatment of infections in veterinary medicine. For these reasons, the aim of this work is to provide animal health practitioners with information on a drug that is not extensively recognized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26623336PMC4629597W1960549380What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.