ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2015
Oral gastrografin radiography for the evaluation of the functional impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Correlation with clinicopathological findings.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Diagnosis and Treatment in China: Focusing on Training and Collaboration.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the functional impact of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) on the gastrointestinal system by oral gastrografin radiography (OGR). OGR was performed on 105 patients with PC from abdominal malignancies. The OGR characteristics were analyzed and compared with intraoperative observations. OGR provided real-time dynamic information on the functional impacts of PC. The OGR findings were normal in 9 (8.6%) and abnormal in 96 (91.4%) cases. In terms of frequency, 33 cases (31.4%) exhibited mild intestinal aggregation and flattening of the intestinal mucosa; 29 cases (27.6%) exhibited limited intestinal invasion, marginally stenotic small bowel and mucosal deformities; 26 cases (24.8%) exhibited only mild mesenteric contracture and mild slowing of gastrointestinal peristalsis; 5 cases (4.8%) exhibited obvious mesenteric contracture, ball-like changes, fixed position and disappearance of the intestinal mucosa; 2 cases (1.9%) exhibited complete pyloric obstruction; and 1 case (0.9%) exhibited duodenal obstruction. Gastric PC was associated with a higher percentage of stomach filling defects and small intestinal aggregates compared with PC from other malignancies (P<0.01 for both). In 87 cases, the ORG findings were in accordance with the intraoperative findings (κ=0.726, P<0.001), whereas 17 cases (16.2%) were underestimated and 1 (0.9%) was overestimated by OGR. This study indicated that OGR may be a useful technique for the evaluation of the functional impacts of PC on the gastrointestinal system and may help optimize the selection of patients for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.