ArticleOncology letters2015
Association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis of 5,757 cases and 8,501 controls.
Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and gastric cancer susceptibility: an updated meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Review
- Associations of theBiomedical reports · 2021Article
- Observational
- Non-random distribution of gastric cancer susceptible loci on human chromosomes.EXCLI journal · 2018Article
- State of Art of Cancer Pharmacogenomics in Latin American Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current data regarding the association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and the risk of developing gastric cancer are insufficient to draw definite conclusions. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to achieve a more precise estimation of the association. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Wanfang database searches resulted in the identification of 28 eligible studies describing 5,757 cases and 8,501 controls. The strength of the association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and gastric cancer risk were evaluated using crude odds ratios (ORs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled ORs were determined using homozygous (TT vs. CC), heterozygous (CT vs. CC), dominant (TT+CT vs. CC) and recessive (TT vs. CC+CT) models. When all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, significant associations were identified between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the risk of gastric cancer (homozygous model: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.20-1.62; heterozygous model: OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32; dominant model: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.38; recessive model: OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.42). Stratification of the data by ethnicity identified a statistically significantly elevated risk of gastric cancer in Asian MTHFR C677T polymorphism populations (homozygous model: OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.43-1.90; heterozygous model: OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45; dominant model: OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.54; recessive model: OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.25-1.51), but not in Caucasian populations (homozygous model: OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89-1.48; heterozygous model: OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25; dominant model: OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.86-1.28; recessive model: OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31). Following adjustment for heterogeneity, the current meta-analysis demonstrated that the MTHFR C677T polymorphism was not associated with the risk of gastric cancer in Caucasian individuals. Furthermore, no evidence of publication bias was observed. Thus, the current meta-analysis indicates that the MTHFR C677T allele may be a low-penetrant risk factor for the development of gastric cancer in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.