Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26622620›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2015

Breast carcinoma metastasis to the lacrimal gland: Two case reports.

Marie N Nickelsen, Sarah VON Holstein, Alastair B Hansen, Jan U Prause, Steffen Heegaard

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Metastasis in the periocular region].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Masses of the Lacrimal Gland: Evaluation and Treatment.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2021
    Article
  6. Lacrimal Sac Metastasis from Phyllodes Tumor of the Breast.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marie N NickelsenEye Pathology Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Sarah VON HolsteinEye Pathology Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark ; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Glostrup, Glostrup, Greater Copenhagen 2600, Denmark.
Alastair B HansenDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev, Copenhagen 2730, Denmark.
Jan U PrauseEye Pathology Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Steffen HeegaardEye Pathology Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark ; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Glostrup, Glostrup, Greater Copenhagen 2600, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 77-year-old female, with proptosis, reduced eye motility and diplopia which had developed over two to three months and a 69-year-old female with proptosis, oedema of the eyelid, reduced motility and ptosis, which had developed over three weeks, are presented in the present study. Computed tomography scans revealed irregular lacrimal gland tumours in the two patients. The two patients had history of breast cancer. The first breast cancer metastasis in the lacrimal gland demonstrated a cribriform growth pattern containing ductal elements. The epithelial tumour cells stained positive for cytokeratin (1-8, 10, 14-16, 18 and 19), oestrogen receptor, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15). The second metastatic tumour was positive for EMA and estrogen receptor, but variably positive for CEA and GCDFP-15. The metastasis in the lacrimal gland was a pleomorphic tumour. The tumour cells were positive for EMA and variably positive for oestrogen and CEA. Metastases to the lacrimal gland are extremely rare, and metastases to the lacrimal gland should be considered in the diagnoses of lacrimal gland tumours. The present study aimed to describe two such cases and draw attention to breast carcinomas as a differential diagnosis and the most frequent cause of lacrimal gland metastasis.

Indexed as

breast cancerimmunohistochemistrylacrimal glandmetastasispathology

Identifiers

PMID26622620
PMCPMC4509022
OpenAlexW1622872655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.