Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26622578›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2015

S6K1 inhibition enhances the apoptotic cell death of breast cancer cells in response to Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibition by the downregulation of survivin.

Jin-Ah Park, Hyeon-Ok Jin, Ha-Na Lee, Jin-Hee Kim, In-Chul Park, Woo Chul Noh, Yoon Hwan Chang, Young Jun Hong, Keun-Chul Kim, Jin Kyung Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. MiR-181a Promotes Spermatogenesis by Targeting the S6K1 Pathway.International journal of stem cells · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Distinct Roles of mTOR Targets S6K1 and S6K2 in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin-Ah ParkKIRAMS Radiation Biobank, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea ; Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon-Ok JinKIRAMS Radiation Biobank, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Ha-Na LeeKIRAMS Radiation Biobank, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Hee KimKIRAMS Radiation Biobank, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
In-Chul ParkDivision of Radiation Cancer Research, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Woo Chul NohDepartment of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Hwan ChangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Young Jun HongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Keun-Chul KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Republic of Korea.
Jin Kyung LeeKIRAMS Radiation Biobank, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul 139-706, Republic of Korea.
Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer cells possess a deregulated apoptotic pathway with increased expression levels of anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) family proteins and ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1) protein activity. Therefore, combined interference of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family and S6K1 protein expression may be a reasonable therapeutic strategy for the treatment of patients with breast cancer. In the present study, it was identified that the administration of a combination of ABT263 [navitoclax; a Bcl-2/Bcl-extra large (Bcl-xL) inhibitor] and PF4708671 (an S6K1 inhibitor) markedly increased apoptotic cell death in the BT474 breast cancer cells compared with the administration of either agent alone. Furthermore, the downregulation of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL and S6K1 with small interfering RNA induced a significant increase in cell death compared with RNA interference of either agent alone. Notably, combination treatment with ABT263 and PF4708671 decreased the expression level of survivin protein, with this ectopic expression of survivin attenuating cell death. Thus, the present study determined that the combined inhibition of Bcl-2/Bcl-xL and S6K1 may be a good strategy for treating patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

B-cell lymphoma-2B-cell lymphoma-extra largebreast cancerribosomal S6 kinase 1survivin

Identifiers

PMID26622578
PMCPMC4509134
OpenAlexW2156718422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.