Clarification of Safe Delivery by Iranian Experts Based on Clinical Governance: A Qualitative Study.

Forozun Olfati, Saeid Asefzadeh, Nasrin Changizi, Masud Yonesian, Afsaneh Keramat

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family & reproductive health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Forozun OlfatiStudent Research Committee, Department of reproductive health, Shahroud University of Medical Science, Shahroud, Iran.

Saeid AsefzadehDepartment of health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Nasrin ChangiziCenter for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Masud YonesianInstitute for Environmental Research, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Afsaneh KeramatSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Science, Shahroud, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo clarify the principles of a safe delivery based on Clinical Governance Criteria, as recommended by the pertinent experts. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe current study was part of a qualitative research conducted by content analysis method in 2013 and purposive sampling, performing 24 in-depth interviews based on semi-structured questions and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The participants in this research included midwives, obstetricians, managers, and hospital doctors. The data were under continuous consideration and comparative analysis in order to achieve data saturation.

resultsThe main concepts derived from interpretations of the pertinent experts include: Patient & Public involvement; Risk Management; Education; Clinical efficiency; Clinical audit; Personnel & Management.

conclusionIn a safe delivery, there is a vicious cycle of causes the elimination of which is only possible through benchmarking patterns that attend to most aspects of a safe delivery. Changes to services require utilization of appropriate change management strategies.

Indexed as

ClarificationClinicalDeliveryGovernanceQualitative researchSafe

Identifiers

PMID26622310

PMCPMC4662755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.