ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2015
Navigational Tools for Interventional Radiology and Interventional Oncology Applications.
Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in intratumoral therapies for liver tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Interventional Radiology.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Stability of Thermoablation Antenna Using a Patient-Mounted Navigation System: Initial Clinical Experience.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Electromagnetic Navigation in Cranial Neurosurgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Smart goggles augmented reality CT-US fusion compared to conventional fusion navigation for percutaneous needle insertion.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of augmented reality training for a navigation device used for CT-guided needle placement.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Augmented Reality Navigation System (SIRIO) for Neuroprotection in Vertebral Tumoral Ablation.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Innovations in Image-Guided Procedures: Unraveling Robot-Assisted Non-Hepatic Percutaneous Ablation.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024Review
- Quantitative differences in volumetric calculations for radiation dosimetry in segmental Y90 treatment planning using hybrid angiography-CT compared with anatomic segmentation.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Navigation and Robotics in Interventional Oncology: Current Status and Future Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bone biopsies guided by augmented reality: a pilot study.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Transarterial Embolization and Percutaneous Ablation of Primary and Metastatic Soft Tissue Tumors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Improving puncture accuracy in percutaneous CT-guided needle insertion with wireless inertial measurement unit: a phantom study.European radiology · 2023Article
- Procedural Software Toolkit in the Armamentarium of Interventional Therapies: A Review of Additive Usefulness and Current Evidence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Case report: Experience with the Cube Navigation System in complex access routes during CT-guided lumbosacral infiltration therapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Image Fusion Involving Real-Time Transabdominal or Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Review of Current and Future Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Navigation Guidance for Percutaneous Splanchnic Nerve Radiofrequency Neurolysis: Preliminary Results.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-guided biopsy of challenging abdominopelvic targets.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022Review
- Robotic assistance for percutaneous needle insertion in the kidney: preclinical proof on a swine animal model.European radiology experimental · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interventional radiologist is increasingly called upon to successfully access challenging biopsy and ablation targets, which may be difficult based on poor visualization, small size, or the proximity of vulnerable regional anatomy. Complex therapeutic procedures, including tumor ablation and transarterial oncologic therapies, can be associated with procedural risk, significant procedure time, and measurable radiation time. Navigation tools, including electromagnetic, optical, laser, and robotic guidance systems, as well as image fusion platforms, have the potential to facilitate these complex interventions with the potential to improve lesion targeting, reduce procedure time, and radiation dose, and thus potentially improve patient outcomes. This review will provide an overview of currently available navigational tools and their application to interventional radiology and oncology. A summary of the pertinent literature on the use of these tools to improve safety and efficacy of interventional procedures compared with conventional techniques will be presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.