Research into practice: accessing primary care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Mismatch between registration possibilities and patients' local health needs, a simulated patient survey in the Paris metropolitan area.Human resources for health · 2025
   Article
2. Patterns in GP appointment systems: a cluster analysis of 3480 English practices.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
   Article
3. The patient's perspectives of safe and routine proactive deprescribing in primary care for older people living with polypharmacy: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2024
   Article
4. General Practitioner Time Availability Per Inhabitant Per Year: A New Indicator to Measure Access to Primary Care.Frontiers in health services · 2022
   Article
5. Workforce predictive risk modelling: development of a model to identify general practices at risk of a supply-demand imbalance.BMJ open · 2020
   Article
6. Access to general practice in England: political, theoretical, and empirical considerations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
   Article
7. Access to primary care: creative solutions are needed.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as