Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26622035›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

Improving patient safety culture in general practice: an interview study.

Natasha J Verbakel, Antoinette A de Bont, Theo J M Verheij, Cordula Wagner, Dorien L M Zwart

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient safety research in primary care: where are we now?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha J VerbakelPI Research Quality and Safety in general practice, head of students education of general practice, Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Antoinette A de BontResearcher at the Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Theo J M VerheijPI Research Quality and Safety in general practice, head of students education of general practice, Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cordula WagnerEMGO+ Institute, Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dorien L M ZwartPI Research Quality and Safety in general practice, head of students education of general practice, Department of General Practice, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam Public Health · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen improving patient safety a positive safety culture is key. As little is known about improving patient safety culture in primary care, this study examined whether administering a culture questionnaire with or without a complementary workshop could be used as an intervention for improving safety culture.

aimTo gain insight into how two interventions affected patient safety culture in everyday practice. DESIGN AND

settingAfter conducting a randomised control trial of two interventions, this was a qualitative study conducted in 30 general practices to aid interpretation of the previous quantitative findings.

methodInterviews were conducted at practice locations (n = 27) with 24 GPs and 24 practice nurses. The theory of communities of practice--in particular, its concepts of a domain, a community, and a practice--was used to interpret the findings by examining which elements were or were not present in the participating practices.

resultsCommunal awareness of the problem was only raised after getting together and discussing patient safety. The combination of a questionnaire and workshop enhanced the interaction of team members and nourished team feelings. This shared experience also helped them to understand and develop tools and language for daily practice.

conclusionIn order for patient safety culture to improve, the safety culture questionnaire was more successful when accompanied by a practice workshop. Initial discussion and negotiation of shared goals during the workshop fuelled feelings of coherence and belonging to a community wishing to learn about enhancing patient safety. Team meetings and day-to-day interactions enhanced further liaison and sharing, making patient safety a common and conscious goal.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeGeneral PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicMedical ErrorsOrganizational CultureOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient SafetyQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareRisk ManagementSurveys and Questionnairesinterventioninterview studypatient safetyprimary health caresafetysafety culture

Identifiers

PMID26622035
PMCPMC4655736
OpenAlexW2182521553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.