Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26622032›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland.

Gary McLean, Bruce Guthrie, Stewart W Mercer, Graham C M Watt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Addressing the inverse care law in Scottish general practice: systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 'Challenging but ultimately rewarding' - lived experiences of Deep End Northern Ireland GPs: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gary McLeanGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Bruce GuthrieQuality Safety and Informatics Research Group, Population Health Sciences Division, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee.
Stewart W MercerGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
Graham C M WattGeneral Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/01Chief Scientist Office ARPG/07/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal access to health care, as provided in the NHS, does not ensure that patients' needs are met.

aimTo explore the relationships between multimorbidity, general practice funding, and workload by deprivation in a national healthcare system. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional study using routine data from 956 general practices in Scotland.

methodEstimated numbers of patients with multimorbidity, estimated numbers of consultations per 1000 patients, and payments to practices per patient are presented and analysed by deprivation decile at practice level.

resultsLevels of multimorbidity rose with practice deprivation. Practices in the most deprived decile had 38% more patients with multimorbidity compared with the least deprived (222.8 per 1000 patients versus 161.1; P<0.001) and over 120% more patients with combined mental-physical multimorbidity (113.0 per 1000 patients versus 51.5; P<0.001). Practices in the most deprived decile had 20% more consultations per annum compared with the least deprived (4616 versus 3846, P<0.001). There was no association between total practice funding and deprivation (Spearman ρ -0.09; P = 0.03). Although consultation rates increased with deprivation, the social gradients in multimorbidity were much steeper. There was no association between consultation rates and levels of funding.

conclusionNo evidence was found that general practice funding matches clinical need, as estimated by different definitions of multimorbidity. Consultation rates provide only a partial estimate of the work involved in addressing clinical needs and are poorly related to the prevalence of multimorbidity. In these circumstances, general practice is unlikely to mitigate health inequalities and may increase them.

Indexed as

General PracticeSocioeconomic FactorsState MedicineAge DistributionChronic DiseaseComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPoverty AreasPrevalenceScotlandWorkloadconsultation ratesfundinggeneral practiceinverse care lawmultimorbidity

Identifiers

PMID26622032
PMCPMC4655733
OpenAlexW2173740168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.