ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2015
Challenges in pulmonary hypertension: managing the unexpected.
Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of bolus isosorbide dinitrate on pulmonary hypertension with cardiopulmonary comorbidities.Heart and vessels · 2025Article
- Recommendations for evaluation and diagnosis of extra-glandular manifestations of primary sjogren syndrome: results of an epidemiologic systematic review/meta-analysis and a consensus guideline from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (articular, pulmonary and renal).Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Treatment of Vasodilator-resistant Mixed Connective Tissue Disease-associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension with Glucocorticoid and Cyclophosphamide.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2017Article
- Improving patient outcomes in pulmonary hypertension.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diverse challenges associated with diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary hypertension are illustrated in this case-based review. Case 1 describes a patient diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with right heart failure and active systemic lupus erythematosus who was effectively treated with an up-front triple combination of PAH therapies and immunosuppressive therapy. In case 2, a diagnosis of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease was reached after a combined approach of clinical suspicion, physical examination, and invasive and noninvasive tests. Cautious PAH therapy and high-dose diuretics provided clinical benefit in this patient and served as a bridge to lung transplantation. These cases highlight the need for ongoing follow-up of patients with PAH, comprising frequent assessment of treatment success and continued diagnostic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.