Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621978›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2015

Right heart catheterisation: best practice and pitfalls in pulmonary hypertension.

Stephan Rosenkranz, Ioana R Preston

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Novel Therapies of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advancing the diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension-a Brazilian perspective aligned with global standards.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2026
    Article
  14. Diagnosing post-capillary hypertension in patients with left heart disease: impact of new guidelines.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical and imaging characteristics of pulmonary artery dissection.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephan RosenkranzDept III of Internal Medicine and Cologne Cardiovascular Research Center (CCRC), Cologne University Heart Center, Cologne, Germany stephan.rosenkranz@uk-koeln.de.
Ioana R PrestonPulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Division, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tufts Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Right heart catheterisation (RHC) plays a central role in identifying pulmonary hypertension (PH) disorders, and is required to definitively diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite widespread acceptance, there is a lack of guidance regarding the best practice for performing RHC in clinical practice. In order to ensure the correct evaluation of haemodynamic parameters directly measured or calculated from RHC, attention should be drawn to standardising procedures such as the position of the pressure transducer and catheter balloon inflation volume. Measurement of pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, in particular, is vulnerable to over- or under-wedging, which can give rise to false readings. In turn, errors in RHC measurement and data interpretation can complicate the differentiation of PAH from other PH disorders and lead to misdiagnosis. In addition to diagnosis, the role of RHC in conjunction with noninvasive tests is widening rapidly to encompass monitoring of treatment response and establishing prognosis of patients diagnosed with PAH. However, further standardisation of RHC is warranted to ensure optimal use in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBenchmarkingCardiac CathetersCatheterization, Swan-GanzDiagnostic ErrorsEquipment DesignHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisPulmonary ArteryPulmonary Wedge PressureReproducibility of ResultsTransducers, Pressure

Identifiers

PMID26621978
PMCPMC9487613
OpenAlexW2248333849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.