ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2015
Management of high-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the UK: need for alternative models of care to reduce length of stay and admission to angiography times.
Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Direct admission versus interhospital transfer for revascularisation in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Clinical cardiology · 2023Article
- Drug-eluting balloon: is it useful?The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Acute coronary syndromes.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The roll out of the primary percutaneous coronary intervention pathway as the default treatment for patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) across the NHS has led to a paradigm shift in the model of care resulting in a significant improvement in mortality. In comparison, a similar care plan does not exist for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) despite the fact that patients presenting with high-risk non-STEMI carry a similar if not higher mortality at six months in comparison to STEMI. In this article we focus on the contemporary management of NSTE-ACS in the NHS and also look at some of the dedicated pathways already developed and implemented successfully in expediting treatment and decreasing hospital stay without compromising the safety of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.