ArticleNeurosurgical review2016
Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy and neurological recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- The role of autologous bone in cranioplasty. A systematic review of complications and risk factors by using stored bone.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Pooled it
- Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Long-term outcomes following custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 234 consecutive cranioplasty procedures.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Fatal Status Epilepticus After Elective Revision Cranioplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2026Review
- Coverage of necrosis after secondary cranioplasty using a latissimus dorsi muscle flap.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Intractable seizures after cranioplasty, a dreadful post-operative complication managed efficiently from Nepal: A case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Neurological update: consult the neurosurgical oracle for a standard operating procedure.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2021Review
- Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty.Acta neurochirurgica · 2021Article
- Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention.Journal of neurology · 2020Observational
- Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.Neurosurgical review · 2020Article
- Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement.Acta neurochirurgica · 2019Review
- Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Review
- Aphasic status epilepticus as the sole symptom of epilepsy: A case report and literature review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- A pilot study on the impact of dopamine, serotonin, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype on long-term functional outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage.SAGE open medicine · 2017Article
- Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After performing a decompressive craniectomy, a cranioplastic surgery is usually warranted. The complications of this reconstructive procedure may differ from the initial operation. The authors of this study report on their experience to define patient-specific and procedural risk factors for possible complications following cranioplasty influencing the outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)), mobility, shunt dependency, and seizures. A retrospective analysis of 263 patients of all ages and both sexes who had undergone cranioplasty after craniectomy for traumatic brain injury (including chronic subdural hematoma), subarachnoidal hemorrhage (including intracerebral hemorrhage), ischemic stroke, and tumor surgery in one single center in 12 years from January 2000 to March 2012 has been carried out. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors (age, gender, used cranioplasty material, initial diagnosis, clipped or coil-embolized subarachnoidal hemorrhage (SAH) patients, time interval, complications especially hydrocephalus and seizures, mobility) upon the prognosis described as a dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale. Two hundred forty-eight patients met the study criteria. The overall complication rate after cranioplastic surgery was 18.5% (46 patients). Complications included: surgical site infection, epidural hematoma, hydrocephalus with or without former SAH, and new-onset seizures. Logistic regression analysis identified significant correlation between a low GOS (2 or 3) and postoperative seizures (OR 2.37, CI 1.35-4.18, p < 0.05), shunt-depending hydrocephalus (OR 5.83, CI 3.06-11.11, p < 0.05), and age between 51 and 70 years (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.09-5.29, p = 0.029). However, gender, time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, initial diagnosis, and used cranioplasty material had no significant influence on post-cranioplasty complications as surgical site infections, hematoma, wound healing disturbance, seizures, or hydrocephalus. Evaluation of treatment modality in aneurysmal SAH clip vs. coil showed no significant relation to postoperative complications either. Complications after cranioplastic surgery are a common problem, as prognostic factors could identify a shunt-depending hydrocephalus and epilepsia to develop a major deficit after cranioplastic surgery (GOS 2 or 3). We detected a significant extra risk of people between the age of 51 and 70 years to end up in GOS level 2 or 3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.