Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621489›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2016

How computer simulations of the human heart can improve anti-arrhythmia therapy.

Natalia A Trayanova, Kelly C Chang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CaFrontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia A TrayanovaJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Kelly C ChangJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Virtual Electrophysiology LaboratoryDP1HL123271 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS DP1 HL123271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, the state-of-the-art in cardiac computational modelling has progressed rapidly. The electrophysiological function of the heart can now be simulated with a high degree of detail and accuracy, opening the doors for simulation-guided approaches to anti-arrhythmic drug development and patient-specific therapeutic interventions. In this review, we outline the basic methodology for cardiac modelling, which has been developed and validated over decades of research. In addition, we present several recent examples of how computational models of the human heart have been used to address current clinical problems in cardiac electrophysiology. We will explore the use of simulations to improve anti-arrhythmic pacing and defibrillation interventions; to predict optimal sites for clinical ablation procedures; and to aid in the understanding and selection of arrhythmia risk markers. Together, these studies illustrate how the tremendous advances in cardiac modelling are poised to revolutionize medical treatment and prevention of arrhythmia.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsArrhythmias, CardiacComputer SimulationHeartHumans

Identifiers

PMID26621489
PMCPMC4850196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.