Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621354›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology2016

Naloxone Administration in US Emergency Departments, 2000-2011.

Joseph W Frank, Cari Levy, Susan L Calcaterra, Jason A Hoppe, Ingrid A Binswanger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Devil Is in the Details but the Details Are Not in NHAMCS.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph W FrankDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mailstop B180, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. joseph.frank@ucdenver.edu.
Cari LevyVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, 1055 Clermont Street, Denver, CO, 80207, USA.
Susan L CalcaterraDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mailstop B180, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Jason A HoppeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Ingrid A BinswangerDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Mailstop B180, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Denver Health Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Colorado Hospital · USWashington Poison Center · US

Funding

Overdose Risk Assessment, Counseling and Naloxone Prescription in Health CareR34DA035952 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI BINSWANGER, INGRID A · 2013 to 2015
$837k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA035952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of opioid overdose and opioid-related emergency department (ED) visits have increased dramatically. Naloxone is an effective antidote to potentially fatal opioid overdose, but little is known about naloxone administration in ED settings. We examined trends and correlates of naloxone administration in ED visits nationally from 2000 to 2011. Using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we examined ED visits involving (1) the administration of naloxone or (2) a diagnosis of opioid overdose, abuse, or dependence. We assessed patient characteristics in these visits, including concomitant administration of prescription opioid medications. We used logistic regression to identify correlates of naloxone administration. From 2000 to 2011, naloxone was administered in an estimated 1.7 million adult ED visits nationally; 19 % of these visits recorded a diagnosis of opioid overdose, abuse, or dependence. An estimated 2.9 million adult ED visits were related to opioid overdose, abuse, or dependence; 11 % of these visits involved naloxone administration. In multivariable logistic regression models, patient age, race, and insurance and non-rural facility location were independently associated with naloxone administration. An opioid medication was provided in 14 % of visits involving naloxone administration. Naloxone was administered in a minority of ED visits related to opioid overdose, abuse, or dependence. Among all ED visits involving naloxone administration, prescription opioids were also provided in one in seven visits. Further work should explore the provider decision-making in the management of opioid overdose in ED settings and examine patient outcomes following these visits.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDrug OverdoseEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth TransitionHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNaloxoneNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsDrug overdoseEmergency departmentNaloxoneOpioid analgesics

Identifiers

PMID26621354
PMCPMC4880605
OpenAlexW2187770862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.