ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2015
[Complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Avoid, recognize and treat].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subfoveal choroidal thickness increases after excimer laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty but not after excimer laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty is the predominant keratoplasty procedure in Germany since 2016: a report of the DOG-section cornea and its keratoplasty registry.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- [Excimer laser-assisted DALK: a case report from the Homburg Keratoconus Center (HKC)].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Review
- [Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty : Experiences and results of the first 100 consecutive DALK from the University Eye Hospital of Cologne].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017Article
- [Update: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus. When, how and why].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) offers tremendous advantages over penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Intraoperative safety is increased due to reduced opening of the eye interoperatively and the fact that no endothelial graft rejection can take place as the patient's own corneal endothelium is retained. Despite these advantages the number of DALK procedures performed each year in Germany remains constant at a low level. One reason could be that the DALK technique offers some complexity and at the same time intraoperative conversion to PK has to be performed in some cases due to rupture of Descemet's membrane. Moreover, interface-related and DALK-specific complications exist which can contribute to an unfavorable visual outcome. Most of these complications, such as incomplete attachment of Descemet's membrane or opacification within the interface between Descemet's membrane and the posterior corneal stoma can be resolved by adequate measures making PK for revision barely necessary. As visual acuity does not differ between PK and DALK, the benefits of DALK - lack of endothelial immune reaction and increased ocular stability during surgery - outweigh the risk of additional complications and DALK should therefore be performed whenever appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.