Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621137›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

Corona mortis: in vivo anatomical knowledge and the risk of injury in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

M Ates, E Kinaci, E Kose, V Soyer, B Sarici, S Cuglan, F Korkmaz, A Dirican

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Corona mortis: clinical evaluation of prevalence, anatomy, and relevance in anterior approaches to the pelvis and acetabulum.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anatomical position of the corona mortis relative to the anteroposterior and inlet views.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AtesDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
E KinaciDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University (Works in fellowship program), Malatya, Turkey. erdemkinaci@gmail.com.
E KoseDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
V SoyerDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
B SariciDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
S CuglanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
F KorkmazDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
A DiricanDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Inonu University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCorona mortis (CMOR) is the arterial and/or venous vascular communication(s) between the obturator and external iliac vessels. Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty can be associated with vascular complications especially during the fixation of the mesh. Theoretically, CMOR is an important nominee. But, the data in literature are insufficient about CMOR injury. Additionally, most of the studies about CMOR have been usually performed on cadavers. We aimed to reveal the preperitoneal vascular anatomy of inguinal area and provide in vivo knowledge about CMOR. The risk of arterial injury was also evaluated. MATERIALS: The data of preperitoneal vascular anatomy of 321 patients who underwent TEP procedure between January 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.

resultsMean age was 46 ± 8.9 years, 53 females vs 268 males. 391 hemipelvises were evaluated. Two types of arterial structure were identified; (1) an aberrant obturator artery forming an anastomosis with branches of ordinary obturator artery; (2) a pubic branch of inferior epigastric artery. The incidence of arterial CMOR was 28.4 % and of any arterial structure was 45.0 %. An arterial CMOR was considered as thick (≥2 mm) or thin (<2 mm). Injury of arterial CMOR during tack stapling on Cooper's ligament was seen in six cases (1.5 %). All of them were thin (<2 mm) in structure. Venous CMOR was visible only under low pressure in work space.

conclusionDuring TEP hernia repair, CMOR and/or pubic branch of inferior epigastric artery can be damaged. To prevent this complication, tacks should be stapled to Cooper's ligament close to symphysis pubis and dissection should be careful on the posterior surface of superior pubic ramus. Small caliber (<2 mm) arterial CMOR is more prone to be injured during TEP procedure. To explore venous structures properly, pressure in workspace should be kept as low as possible.

Indexed as

AdultCadaverFemaleHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIliac ArteryIliac VeinLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPelvisRetrospective StudiesVascular System InjuriesAnastomosisBleeding complicationsCorona mortisGroinInferior epigastric arteryInguinalLaparoscopicObturator arteryRetropubicTEP

Identifiers

PMID26621137
OpenAlexW2276172246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.