Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621106›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2016

Molecular variability elicits a tunable switch with discrete neuromodulatory response phenotypes.

Warren D Anderson, Hirenkumar K Makadia, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Warren D AndersonDaniel Baugh Institute for Functional Genomics and Computational Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Hirenkumar K MakadiaDaniel Baugh Institute for Functional Genomics and Computational Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Rajanikanth VadigepalliDaniel Baugh Institute for Functional Genomics and Computational Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust St, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Rajanikanth.Vadigepalli@jefferson.edu.

Funding

Modeling Central Autonomic Regulatory Network Adaptation to HypertensionR01HL111621 · NHLBI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWABER, JAMES, VADIGEPALLI, RAJANIKANTH · 2012 to 2015
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL111621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent single cell studies show extensive molecular variability underlying cellular responses. We evaluated the impact of molecular variability in the expression of cell signaling components and ion channels on electrophysiological excitability and neuromodulation. We employed a computational approach that integrated neuropeptide receptor-mediated signaling with electrophysiology. We simulated a population of neurons in which expression levels of a neuropeptide receptor and multiple ion channels were simultaneously varied within a physiological range. We analyzed the effects of variation on the electrophysiological response to a neuropeptide stimulus. Our results revealed distinct response patterns associated with low versus high receptor levels. Neurons with low receptor levels showed increased excitability and neurons with high receptor levels showed reduced excitability. These response patterns were separated by a narrow receptor level range forming a separatrix. The position of this separatrix was dependent on the expression levels of multiple ion channels. To assess the relative contributions of receptor and ion channel levels to the response profiles, we categorized the responses into six phenotypes based on response kinetics and magnitude. We applied several multivariate statistical approaches and found that receptor and channel expression levels influence the neuromodulation response phenotype through a complex though systematic mapping. Our analyses extended our understanding of how cellular responses to neuromodulation vary as a function of molecular expression. Our study showed that receptor expression and biophysical state interact with distinct relative contributions to neuronal excitability.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalAnimalsBiophysicsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationElectrophysiologyIon ChannelsNeuronsNeuropeptidesNeurotransmitter AgentsPhenotypeReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Purinergic P1Regression AnalysisSignal TransductionIon ChannelsNeuropeptidesNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, Purinergic P1BiophysicsDynamical systemNeuromodulationNeurophysiology

Identifiers

PMID26621106
PMCPMC4867553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.