ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2016
Molecular variability elicits a tunable switch with discrete neuromodulatory response phenotypes.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A balance of outward and linear inward ionic currents is required for generation of slow-wave oscillations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Novel Influences of IL-10 on CNS Inflammation Revealed by Integrated Analyses of Cytokine Networks and Microglial Morphology.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent single cell studies show extensive molecular variability underlying cellular responses. We evaluated the impact of molecular variability in the expression of cell signaling components and ion channels on electrophysiological excitability and neuromodulation. We employed a computational approach that integrated neuropeptide receptor-mediated signaling with electrophysiology. We simulated a population of neurons in which expression levels of a neuropeptide receptor and multiple ion channels were simultaneously varied within a physiological range. We analyzed the effects of variation on the electrophysiological response to a neuropeptide stimulus. Our results revealed distinct response patterns associated with low versus high receptor levels. Neurons with low receptor levels showed increased excitability and neurons with high receptor levels showed reduced excitability. These response patterns were separated by a narrow receptor level range forming a separatrix. The position of this separatrix was dependent on the expression levels of multiple ion channels. To assess the relative contributions of receptor and ion channel levels to the response profiles, we categorized the responses into six phenotypes based on response kinetics and magnitude. We applied several multivariate statistical approaches and found that receptor and channel expression levels influence the neuromodulation response phenotype through a complex though systematic mapping. Our analyses extended our understanding of how cellular responses to neuromodulation vary as a function of molecular expression. Our study showed that receptor expression and biophysical state interact with distinct relative contributions to neuronal excitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.