Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621054›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2016

Active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Javier Romero-Otero, Borja García-Gómez, José M Duarte-Ojeda, Alfredo Rodríguez-Antolín, Antoni Vilaseca, Sigrid V Carlsson, Karim A Touijer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Radiomics Improves Cancer Screening and Early Detection.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Javier Romero-OteroUrology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Borja García-GómezUrology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
José M Duarte-OjedaUrology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Alfredo Rodríguez-AntolínUrology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Antoni VilasecaUrology Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Sigrid V CarlssonUrology Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
Karim A TouijerUrology Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is worth distinguishing between the two strategies of expectant management for prostate cancer. Watchful waiting entails administering non-curative androgen deprivation therapy to patients on development of symptomatic progression, whereas active surveillance entails delivering curative treatment on signs of disease progression. The objectives of the two management strategies and the patients enrolled in either are different: (i) to review the role of active surveillance as a management strategy for patients with low-risk prostate cancer; and (ii) review the benefits and pitfalls of active surveillance. We carried out a systematic review of active surveillance for prostate cancer in the literature using the National Center for Biotechnology Information's electronic database, PubMed. We carried out a search in English using the terms: active surveillance, prostate cancer, watchful waiting and conservative management. Selected studies were required to have a comprehensive description of the demographic and disease characteristics of the patients at the time of diagnosis, inclusion criteria for surveillance, and a protocol for the patients' follow up. Review articles were included, but not multiple papers from the same datasets. Active surveillance appears to reduce overtreatment in patients with low-risk prostate cancer without compromising cancer-specific survival at 10 years. Therefore, active surveillance is an option for select patients who want to avoid the side-effects inherent to the different types of immediate treatment. However, inclusion criteria for active surveillance and the most appropriate method of monitoring patients on active surveillance have not yet been standardized.

Indexed as

Medical OveruseAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensDisease ProgressionHumansMaleNeoplasm GradingProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensProstate-Specific Antigenactive surveillancebiological markersbiopsymagnetic resonance imagingprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26621054
PMCPMC4966658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.