Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621040›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2016

Delayed Efficacy After Treatment With Lenalidomide or Thalidomide in Patients With Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma.

Barbara Kiesewetter, Marlene Troch, Marius E Mayerhoefer, Werner Dolak, Ingrid Simonitsch-Klupp, Markus Raderer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara KiesewetterClinical Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marlene TrochClinical Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marius E MayerhoeferDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Werner DolakClinical Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ingrid Simonitsch-KluppDepartment of Pathology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Markus RadererClinical Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria markus.raderer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide have both been tested for treatment of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, with lenalidomide, in particular, showing promising activity. However, long-term results are missing. Because of the late-onset remissions registered in individual patients, we have systemically analyzed the patients treated with IMiDs at our institution for long-term results.

methodsWithin the present retrospective analysis, we identified 25 patients who had been treated with lenalidomide (n = 18) or thalidomide (n = 7) and were available for long-term assessments of outcome. All patients were followed up according to a standardized follow-up protocol.

resultsOf the 25 patients, 7 (28%) experienced delayed-onset responses without further treatment (thalidomide, n = 2; lenalidomide, n = 5). In 4 patients (16%), the initial outcome switched to a better result (partial remission [PR] to complete remission [CR], n = 1; stable disease [SD] to PR, n = 1; SD to CR, n = 1; and PD to CR, n = 1) after a median time of 19.5 months (range, 10.9-32.0). Furthermore, 2 patients showed ongoing shrinkage of the target lesion for 47.4+ and 43.5+ months, respectively, and 1 patient had durable disease stabilization for 16.2+ months. The median time to the best response for all responding patients (13 of 25; 53%) was 7.3 months (interquartile range [IQR], 5.6-22.5). After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR, 32.0-58.5), 23 of 25 patients (92%) were alive.

conclusionOur findings suggest that late-onset remissions might be a common phenomenon in the use of IMiDs for the treatment of MALT lymphoma. Thus, sufficient follow-up time after treatment before the initiation of further therapy appears crucial to assess the full effect of therapy and avoid unnecessary overtreatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide and lenalidomide have been tested for the treatment of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, with lenalidomide showing promising activity. However, long-term results are missing. The present findings suggest that late-onset remissions and delayed responses could be a common phenomenon with IMiD use for MALT lymphoma. Using a standardized restaging protocol to ensure concise follow-up data, these findings suggest it is of major importance to ensure a sufficient follow-up time after treatment with these compounds and before initiation of further treatment lines, because nearly one third of treated patients showed further improvement during prolonged follow-up.

Indexed as

Remission InductionAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenalidomideLymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal ZoneMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThalidomideTreatment OutcomeLenalidomideThalidomideExtranodal lymphomaImmunomodulatory drugsLenalidomideMucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomaThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID26621040
PMCPMC4709204
OpenAlexW2186700079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.