Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26621010›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2016

Does stroke location predict walk speed response to gait rehabilitation?

P Simon Jones, Valerie M Pomeroy, Jasmine Wang, Gottfried Schlaug, S Tulasi Marrapu, Sharon Geva, Philip J Rowe, Elizabeth Chandler, Andrew Kerr, Jean-Claude Baron and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Stroke Lesion Impact on Lower Limb Function.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

P Simon JonesStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Valerie M PomeroyAcquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Alliance, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Jasmine WangDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gottfried SchlaugDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
S Tulasi MarrapuStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sharon GevaStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Philip J RoweBioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth ChandlerAcquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation Alliance, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Andrew KerrBioengineering Unit, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jean-Claude BaronStroke Research Group, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
SWIFT-Cast investigators

Funding

Medical Research Council G0500874Medical Research Council MC_G1002453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRecovery of independent ambulation after stroke is a major goal. However, which rehabilitation regimen best benefits each individual is unknown and decisions are currently made on a subjective basis. Predictors of response to specific therapies would guide the type of therapy most appropriate for each patient. Although lesion topography is a strong predictor of upper limb response, walking involves more distributed functions. Earlier studies that assessed the cortico-spinal tract (CST) were negative, suggesting other structures may be important. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe relationship between lesion topography and response of walking speed to standard rehabilitation was assessed in 50 adult-onset patients using both volumetric measurement of CST lesion load and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM) to assess non-CST structures. Two functional mobility scales, the functional ambulation category (FAC) and the modified rivermead mobility index (MRMI) were also administered. Performance measures were obtained both at entry into the study (3-42 days post-stroke) and at the end of a 6-week course of therapy. Baseline score, age, time since stroke onset and white matter hyperintensities score were included as nuisance covariates in regression models. PRINCIPAL OBSERVATIONS: CST damage independently predicted response to therapy for FAC and MRMI, but not for walk speed. However, using VLSM the latter was predicted by damage to the putamen, insula, external capsule and neighbouring white matter.

conclusionsWalk speed response to rehabilitation was affected by damage involving the putamen and neighbouring structures but not the CST, while the latter had modest but significant impact on everyday functions of general mobility and gait. Hum Brain Mapp 37:689-703, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationWalkingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainDisability EvaluationExercise TestFemaleFoot OrthosesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisambulationcortico-spinal tractMRIrecoveryvoxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

Identifiers

PMID26621010
PMCPMC4738376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.