ArticleMicrobiome2015
Microbial biogeography of a university campus.
Article in Microbiome, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Shotgun metagenomic sequencing of swab samples from Japanese university campuses.Microbiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Environmental factors and particle size shape the community structure of airborne total and pathogenic bacteria in a university campus.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Phage communities in household-related biofilms correlate with bacterial hosts.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2024Article
- A Pilot Study: the Development of a Facility-Associated Microbiome and Its Association with the Presence ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Article
- The Impacts of the Occupants on the Bacterial Communities of Classrooms.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Understanding building-occupant-microbiome interactions toward healthy built environments: A review.Frontiers of environmental science & engineering · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
- Microbial Community Succession and Nutrient Cycling Responses following Perturbations of Experimental Saltwater Aquaria.mSphere · 2019Article
- Article
- The Seasonal Dynamics and the Influence of Human Activities on Campus Outdoor Microbial Communities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Article
- Temporal Variations of Microbiota Associated with the Immature Stages of Two Florida Culex Mosquito Vectors.Microbial ecology · 2017Article
- Schrödinger's microbes: Tools for distinguishing the living from the dead in microbial ecosystems.Microbiome · 2017Review
- The roles of the outdoors and occupants in contributing to a potential pan-microbiome of the built environment: a review.Microbiome · 2016Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroorganisms are distributed on surfaces within homes, workplaces, and schools, with the potential to impact human health and disease. University campuses represent a unique opportunity to explore the distribution of microorganisms within built environments because of high human population densities, throughput, and variable building usage. For example, the main campus of the University of Waterloo spans four square kilometres, hosts over 40,000 individuals daily, and is comprised of a variety of buildings, including lecture halls, gyms, restaurants, residences, and a daycare.
resultsRepresentative left and right entrance door handles from each of the 65 buildings at the University of Waterloo were swabbed at three time points during an academic term in order to determine if microbial community assemblages coincided with building usage and whether these communities are stable temporally. Across all door handles, the dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetes, which comprised 89.0 % of all reads. A total of 713 genera were observed, 16 of which constituted a minimum of 1 % of the 2,458,094 classified and rarefied reads. Archaea were found in low abundance (~0.03 %) but were present on 42.8 % of the door handles on 96 % of buildings across all time points, indicating that they are ubiquitous at very low levels on door handle surfaces. Although inter-handle variability was high, several individual building entrances harbored distinct microbial communities that were consistent over time. The presence of visible environmental debris on a subset of handles was associated with distinct microbial communities (beta diversity), increased richness (alpha diversity), and higher biomass (adenosine 5'-triphosphate; ATP).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates highly variable microbial communities associated with frequently contacted door handles on a university campus. Nonetheless, the data also revealed several building-specific and temporally stable bacterial and archaeal community patterns, with a potential impact of accumulated debris, a possible result of low human throughput, on detected microbial communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.