Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26620722›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2017

Validity, specificity, feasibility and acceptability of a brief pediatric distress thermometer in outpatient clinics.

Lori Wiener, Haven Battles, Sima Zadeh, Brigitte C Widemann, Maryland Pao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Distress screening and management for adolescents and young adults: 2022 NCI community oncology program landscape assessment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Few guidelines offer recommendations on how to assess and manage anxiety and distress in children with cancer: a content analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lori WienerNational Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Haven BattlesNational Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Sima ZadehNational Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Brigitte C WidemannNational Cancer Institute, Pediatric Oncology Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Maryland PaoNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

Psychiatry Consultation Liaison Service ResearchZIAMH002922 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PAO, MARYLAND · 2009 to 2025
$11.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychosocial distress is under-recognized in children with cancer and other serious medical illnesses because of a focus on pressing medical concerns.

aimsThis study assessed the validity, inter-rater reliability, sensitivity/specificity, acceptability, and feasibility of administration of a pediatric distress thermometer (DT) designed to screen for the presence of psychosocial distress in youth with serious medical illnesses. MATERIALS &

methodsTwo hundred eighty-one patient-caregiver-provider triads were enrolled from two hospital outpatient clinics. Patients diagnosed with cancer and other life-threatening diseases, caregivers, and providers completed the DT and a DT acceptability rating. Patients and caregivers completed standardized measures of anxiety, depression, pain, and fatigue. Providers completed a measure of disease severity. Data collectors completed a feasibility rating.

resultsThe DT was significantly correlated with both caregiver and patient reports of depression, anxiety, pain, and fatigue, exhibiting concurrent validity. Parent, child, and caregiver report demonstrated significant, moderate inter-rater reliability, with lower concordance between raters in the youngest age group. The DT is a sensitive instrument for screening of psychosocial distress when compared with the selected gold standard (Brief Symptom Inventory 18 depression subscale and the Children's Depression Inventory). The DT is not highly specific but quickly identifies those in need of further psychosocial assessment. DISCUSSION: Screening, using an adapted pediatric DT, is valid, feasible, and acceptable to patients, caregivers, and medical providers across chronic medical illnesses.

conclusionAs patient and caregiver reports are not always concordant, both patient and caregiver report of distress are important for the provider to obtain clinically meaningful information to guide interventions. Published 2015. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAnxietyCaregiversChildChronic DiseaseDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsParentsPsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID26620722
PMCPMC4969217
OpenAlexW2186169289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.