ReviewImmunology and cell biology2016
The niche in single-cell technologies.
Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging tissue repair and epithelial carcinogenesis: epigenetic memory and field cancerization.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis between highFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing with Spatial Transcriptomics of Cancer Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Ovarian Cancer: Promises and Challenges.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Review
- Buried myoepithelial stem cells as a reservoir for repairing the exposed airway epithelium.Stem cell investigation · 2018Article
- The Interplay Between Innate-Like B Cells and Other Cell Types in Autoimmunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Single Cell Gene Expression to Understand the Dynamic Architecture of the Heart.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- Oligonucleotide modifications enhance probe stability for single cell transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA).Organic & biomolecular chemistry · 2017Article
- A practical guide to single-cell RNA-sequencing for biomedical research and clinical applications.Genome medicine · 2017Review
- Cutting-edge single-cell genomics and modelling in immunology.Immunology and cell biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The niche is the microenvironment in which each cell exists and is able to keep its own peculiar characteristics. The importance of the niche has been intensively studied especially in the context of stem cells, as it is responsible for both the maintenance of stemness and activation of differentiation. In the past few years, a variety of single-cell technologies have shed light on the extraordinary variability that characterizes different stem cell populations both in vitro and in vivo, but in most cases positional information is lost. Recent developments of new technologies aim to integrate both the transcriptomic profiling of cells and their spatial location. In this review I will discuss the state of the art of these technologies and the integration with others approaches that will be important in the study of stem cell populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26620629What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.