Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26620272›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2016

Molecular therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia.

Catherine C Coombs, Martin S Tallman, Ross L Levine

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. METTL1 mediated tRNA mExperimental hematology & oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Genomic Characterization of Prostatic Basal Cell Carcinoma.The American journal of pathology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine C CoombsLeukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Martin S TallmanLeukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Ross L LevineLeukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, New York 10065, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
ECOG-ACRIN INTEGRATED LEUKEMIA TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH CENTERU10CA180827 · NCI · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI LEVINE, ROSS L, MELNICK, ARI M. · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease that is, in general, associated with a very poor prognosis. Multiple cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities that characterize different forms of AML have been used to better prognosticate patients and inform treatment decisions. Indeed, risk status in patients with this disease has classically been based on cytogenetic findings; however, additional molecular characteristics have been shown to inform risk assessment, including FLT3, NPM1, KIT, and CEBPA mutation status. Advances in sequencing technology have led to the discovery of novel somatic mutations in tissue samples from patients with AML, providing deeper insight into the mutational landscape of the disease. The majority of patients with AML (>97%) are found to have a clonal somatic abnormality on mutational profiling. Nevertheless, our understanding of the utility of mutation profiling in clinical practice remains incomplete and is continually evolving, and evidence-based approaches to application of these data are needed. In this Review, we discuss the evidence-base for integrating mutational data into treatment decisions for patients with AML, and propose novel therapeutic algorithms in the era of molecular medicine.

Indexed as

MutationAcute DiseaseDrug TherapyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLeukemia, MyeloidModels, GeneticMolecular Targeted TherapyNucleophosminPrognosisRisk FactorsNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID26620272
PMCPMC5525060
OpenAlexW2182315038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.