Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26620188›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Validity of the Stages of Change in Steps instrument (SoC-Step) for achieving the physical activity goal of 10,000 steps per day.

Richard R Rosenkranz, Mitch J Duncan, Cristina M Caperchione, Gregory S Kolt, Corneel Vandelanotte, Anthony J Maeder, Trevor N Savage, W Kerry Mummery

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard R RosenkranzKansas State University, Manhattan, USA. ricardo@ksu.edu.
Mitch J DuncanUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. Mitch.Duncan@newcastle.edu.au.
Cristina M CaperchioneUniversity of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada. cristina.caperchione@ubc.ca.
Gregory S KoltWestern Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. g.kolt@westernsydney.edu.au.
Corneel VandelanotteCentral Queensland University, Rockhampton, Australia. c.vandelanotte@cqu.edu.au.
Anthony J MaederWestern Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. a.maeder@westernsydney.edu.au.
Trevor N SavageWestern Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. t.savage@westernsydney.edu.au.
W Kerry MummeryUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. kerry.mummery@ualberta.ca.
Western Sydney University · AUCentral Queensland University · AUKansas State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity (PA) offers numerous benefits to health and well-being, but most adults are not sufficiently physically active to afford such benefits. The 10,000 steps campaign has been a popular and effective approach to promote PA. The Transtheoretical Model posits that individuals have varying levels of readiness for health behavior change, known as Stages of Change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Preparation, Action, and Maintenance). Few validated assessment instruments are available for determining Stages of Change in relation to the PA goal of 10,000 steps per day. The purpose of this study was to assess the criterion-related validity of the SoC-Step, a brief 10,000 steps per day Stages of Change instrument.

methodsParticipants were 504 Australian adults (176 males, 328 females, mean age = 50.8 ± 13.0 years) from the baseline sample of the Walk 2.0 randomized controlled trial. Measures included 7-day accelerometry (Actigraph GT3X), height, weight, and self-reported intention, self-efficacy, and SoC-Step: Stages of Change relative to achieving 10,000 steps per day. Kruskal-Wallis H tests with pairwise comparisons were used to determine whether participants differed by stage, according to steps per day, general health, body mass index, intention, and self-efficacy to achieve 10,000 steps per day. Binary logistic regression was used to test the hypothesis that participants in Maintenance or Action stages would have greater likelihood of meeting the 10,000 steps goal, in comparison to participants in the other three stages.

resultsConsistent with study hypotheses, participants in Precontemplation had significantly lower intention scores than those in Contemplation (p = 0.003) or Preparation (p < 0.001). Participants in Action or Maintenance stages were more likely to achieve ≥10,000 steps per day (OR = 3.11; 95 % CI = 1.66,5.83) compared to those in Precontemplation, Contemplation, or Preparation. Intention (p < 0.001) and self-efficacy (p < 0.001) to achieve 10,000 steps daily differed by stage, and participants in the Maintenance stage had higher general health status and lower body mass index than those in Precontemplation, Contemplation and Preparation stages (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThis brief SoC-Step instrument appears to have good criterion-related validity for determining Stages of Change related to the public health goal of 10,000 steps per day.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference: ACTRN12611000157976 World Health Organization Universal Trial Number: U111-1119-1755.

Indexed as

GoalsHealth BehaviorIntentionSelf ReportWalkingAccelerometryAdultAustraliaBody Mass IndexFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID26620188
PMCPMC4666193
OpenAlexW2182062488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.